Yes, I'm calling you pathetic (And stupid too, if you can't get this point)......
Hillary obviously has thick ankles (Amongst her other lovely traits). Chelsea obviously is not ugly.
The fact that many Freepers bash Chelsea over her looks (Granted, she's not THAT great......Clearly not as pretty as the twins......But not the homely teen she used to be) is grasping for straws when there are SO MANY other reasons to bash her and/or her parents. (Her parents being the main reason she's bashed......And weakest excuse to do so......Weaker than her looks, imo).
Here's another hint, genius...
Those comparison photos of Chelsea and Carrott Top are HILARIOUS simply because the comparison is Obvious and Undeniable (Even by the most hardcore of Clinton Lovers). Look at the hair......Almost a PERFECT match.
Now THAT'S a good, creative and honest bash of her.
Happy...................Pappy?
That's a blatantly political statement. I have no problem with her right to be political, but neither she nor her supporters should expect to be treated as though she isn't political.
In my opinion, she's 100% "fair game" now.
....aaaah I love it when you catch yahoos in thier own web and they begin the name calling - merely proves the point.
youre a fraud plain and simple -
since we dont conform to your opinions you bash - I guess its ok if you do it to Hillary - but we strike a nerve when its webs gawky kid/rabbit child?
Chelsea obviously is not ugly.
just wash your hands when your done