Posted on 03/07/2002 6:08:19 PM PST by blam
I said it before and I'll say it again:
Favoring zero muslim immigration, whether in the Netherlands, Yugoslavia, Denmark, Australia, or the United States is not necessarily "right wing" or "racist".
It just means WANTING TO LIVE as FREE people, and not wanting to leave the children you love a world ruled by muslims!!!! Because total world conquest is what islam has ALWAYS been about!!!
Congratulations to your friends. There is hope.
10,000? Why so many?
I agree, one more is to many.
Peper should know, he was caught when he did large scale fraud. He took family with him to Indonesia and let the city Rotterdam pay for it (cost: about 10.000 Euro a ticket). Also he did fraud with 'businessdinners': he let the city pay for private dinners. But, in typical PvdA fashion, he was left off the hook, creating great controversy.
Also there was a list in the national media, which showed the top 'refunders' (the councilmembers that spend the most money on dinners and trips). Strangely all the top spots were held by PvdA members. But hey, it's just public money and they are socialists, so they public won't mind, they thought! Now they get the bill for screwing around.
I also live in Limburg (in Helden, a toen between Venlo and Roermond).
I confirm the way we Dutch people are fed up with liberalism and the socialists. And about the Dutch people getting excited about him.
My father voted all his life for the PvdA, even my mother could not convince him of the CDA. But he became tired of the way the government treats people. He will vote for Fortuyn too! So will almost all people I know too!
Just like socialist everywhere.
42% is non-Dutch in Rotterdam, and with crime figures like this: "the police in Rotterdam accounced that of the street robberies there, 1% were committed by Dutch nationals and 99% by immigrants (45% were Antillians, 38% Moroccan, 16% Turkish/Eastern European)" (source: the Telegraaf and nu.nl) it is not hard to believe 47,5% of the people in Rotterdam feel unsafe on the streets.
That is correct. Fortuyn is very good at debating and knows his facts very well (he wrote 50 books and was a professor sociology). After the elections there was a debate about the upcoming national elections where Fortuyn and the other leaders of all parties were present. Melkert (from the PvdA, socialists) was angry and sad about his party's incredible loss and was taking it out on Fortuyn. Fortuyn kept his head and he really won the debate. The next day the newspapers wrote that Melkert really looked bad, so bad that now Wim Kok, the PvdA prime-minister will do the campeign from now on.
read: gay = good
but openly racist politician
read: for restricting immigration = bad
Pim Fortuyn...
Just trying to help ya'll read between the lines...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.