Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Time to Show the Servants Who's in Charge (Norman Mineta is an arrogant boob)
KABA ^ | David Codrea

Posted on 03/06/2002 2:19:38 PM PST by Sir Gawain

It's Time to Show the Servants Who's in Charge

by David Codrea
codrea4@adelphia.net 

March 4, 2002

KeepAndBearArms.com — Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta won't allow pilots to carry guns. He says he will allow them to carry stun guns instead, provided they are "properly trained."

Click this image to read "Airplanes & Guns: Myths & Reality"

Who does this arrogant boob think he is? Who does he think he's talking to, children?

Pilots, if you're serious about your rights, it's time to take them. It's time to ground all flights until the servants get back to their job, that is, working for you and the passengers entrusted to your experience, judgment and skill.

Refuse to fly — all of you. Walk out now. Tell Norman and the cowardly airline executives backing his hand that THEY can fly the planes.

You can bring this country to a halt. They don't have anywhere near the pilots to replace you and they know it. They'll cave in within days, not out of principle, but out of sheer political panic over the disruption THEY will have publicly caused, and because they know they will rightfully be blamed. If they try to intimidate you with prosecution for not obeying a back-to-work decree, stand firm — public opinion will kill that threat quickly.

As pilots, it is YOUR duty to ensure the safety of your aircraft — and the government won't let you. Yet it's been proven that airline security measures are as dismally unworkable as ever, and after-the-fact investigations are hopelessly compromised by politics.

• Look at the arrests at Logan Airport, the launchpad for 911, almost SIX MONTHS after the terror flights.

• Observe how security tests routinely prove guns and explosives can be smuggled past checkpoints, where incompetent and ill-trained martinets, drunk on their new authority, grope women to cop a feel and hassle octogenarian Medal of Honor winners (rather than offend leftist sensibilities through the politically incorrect practice of "profiling," that is noting the physical characteristics of the terrorists and screening passengers accordingly).

• Take comfort that these newly-federalized "professionals" sleep in front of monitors and close down airports because the damned metal detectors are unplugged — you couldn't make this stuff up.

• Note how it now looks like one of the terrorists may have had a gun on Flight 11 (hell, note how they all got on board after going through "airport security"), which, if proven, means somebody is LYING to us — and if they are, why should we believe them about Flight 800, where witnesses who reported seeing a missile were summarily dismissed or not even interviewed, or Flight 593, or... ?

You are being hogtied by absurd bureaucrats whose prime directive is, astoundingly, to protect lives and property. Reconcile all of this against your first line of onboard defense: untrained genteel American passengers armed with pillows and laptops vs. fanatical commandos who are inured to hardships, experts at mortal combat, filled with hatred, and who WANT to die. Then take comfort that, after your "defenses" have been breached, you will be blown out of the skies by American fighter jets. But perhaps, if you're still alive as smoke and flames fill the cabin and your craft dives screaming towards a cornfield, you'll take comfort in the "Let's Roll!" logo on your destroyer's fuselage, and your final agony, rage and terror will be mitigated with a surge of patriotic pride.

You are being disarmed by people who know damn well they cannot disarm the enemy. Their protestations of "safety" are a sham. WE know that someone who can pilot a plane is more than qualified to handle a gun — and with at least one world class firearms training operation offering free pilot training, any excuse to keep you disarmed is a politically motivated lie that can be exposed through a simple demonstration: Invite one of the overlords to challenge a Front Sight graduate in a stun gun vs. handgun exhibition. And while you're at it, invite them to show everyone exactly how they intend to take away your gun.

Assuming responsibility for the safety of your passengers, crew and craft while knowing the facts goes beyond willful negligence — it is madness. Yet if you refuse, it won't be YOU who are voiding any contracts — the government and your employers already have, by failing to live up to their responsibilities, and by maintaining what is clearly a massive fraud.

Ground 'em. Talk to your colleagues and get a consensus. Sit your union reps down and force them to represent you. Craft a declaration defining your demands and then develop flu symptoms — all of you. You'll soon find out who is really in charge.

And I'm not just talking about arming yourself on domestic flights-- because terrorists respect no borders. Your demands must include the right to bear arms on international flights as well-- and if a country doesn't want to accept your terms, they can go without service from America. They'll soon find their economies need us worse than we need them.

As a matter of fact, since it's YOU who are in the pilots' seats, don't just stop with your demand to be armed — you have the upper hand, so have some fun with it. Why not also require Secretary Mineta's bodyguards to give up their firearms — tell 'em they can have stun guns. And as long as you've got their attention, give yourselves a raise.

You're holding all the cards. It's time to play them. You don't need their permission, they need yours. Atlas, it's time to shrug.

David Codrea is a co-founder and director for the national pro-rights media campaign, Citizens of America (CitizensOfAmerica.org), and an advisor and contributor for KeepAndBearArms.com. His professional writing is featured often in Guns and Ammo magazine. Additionally, he is the national coordinator for A Petition for the Enforcement of the Second Amendment (KeepAndBearArms.com/Petition). His archives can be accessed here: KeepAndBearArms.com/Codrea.

Related Reading: Airplanes & Guns Archives

 


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist

1 posted on 03/06/2002 2:19:38 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bang_list
-
2 posted on 03/06/2002 2:19:53 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to:
FreeRepublic, LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

Send PayPal direct to JimRob@psnw.com

3 posted on 03/06/2002 2:20:54 PM PST by theophilusscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
The next time Mineta boards a plane, the pilot should declare him a security risk and order him to disembark.
4 posted on 03/06/2002 2:33:13 PM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I have just cancelled my travel plans. I'm sick of being frisked by illegal alien airport weenies. I'm sick of the "victims-R-us" philosophy driving the phoney "airport security". They treat passengers like crap and they STILL haven't installed serious security doors and/or bulkheads in airliners.

The pilot's union needs to strike until the policy is changed to allow them to carry GUNS.....AND...until Norman Menetta is removed. See how quick the Government blinks when thousands of pilots walk off the job!!!!!

5 posted on 03/06/2002 2:35:59 PM PST by VikingsRazeAVillage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
The next time Mineta boards a plane, the pilot should declare him a security risk and order him to disembark.

Now I'd pay good money to see that. Unfortunately it would likely be a miltary or civilian government pilot, since I very much doubt SecTrans flies commercial, anymore than the rest of the nomenkatura does, be they government officials or private corporate executives.

6 posted on 03/06/2002 2:38:57 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

Well, Tom Ridge says the same thing..

His rationale goes like: "Well, where would it end.. I mean then people in Travel and Tourism would want to be armed"

F%&^@*& Moron.. It's not supposed to "end"

That's WHY IT'S IN THE CONSTITUTION IN THE FIRST F@#$^*@ PLACE.

7 posted on 03/06/2002 2:40:32 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Stand up for your rights, Pilots. The people of this nation will stand behind you. And another thing, walk out on Friday morning so all the big wigs in Washington have to take a cab to their home states.
8 posted on 03/06/2002 2:41:50 PM PST by Patriot1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Mineta should allow the airlines to offer two kinds of filghts, one with racial profiling and heat-packing pilots, and one without.

Then we should weigh the airplanes just before takeoff, to see which is heavier.




9 posted on 03/06/2002 2:45:01 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
'Norman Mineta is an arrogant boob"

Now you've done it! We've trying to keep this from two guys in Kansas, the only two people in the country who didn't know it. But, thank goodness, you didn't mention incapable, incompetent, and clueless; the two guys don't know about that yet.

Of course, he is a perfect fit for the FAA, the most inept federal agency ever. In fact, the FAA is so inept that eeven other federal agencies have noticed.

10 posted on 03/06/2002 3:17:46 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I think its time to stop flying public transportation and go to personal airplanes.

Seriously.

I was working out the numbers the other day. If you bought a 1/8 share of a really nice brand new airplane like a Lancair Columbia 300, it'd only cost about as much as a nice SUV. It's pretty efficient. Goes around 200mph.

But the good part is how fast you can get from your doorway to where you're going, even thought the plane is less than half the speed of an airliner.

If you figure the time to drive to the big airport remote parking, ride the bus to the terminal. Wait two hours and get felt up in security. Get crammed into the plane next to some smelly dude. Fly to some airport and wait... and change planes. Go to city of destination. Then drive a long way to where you're going.

That's a real long trip!

The small airplane might have to be kept in a relatively large city (in order to share it among the other owners), but you can fly it to the small airport near where you want to go.

You would have a management company that would manage several airplanes for maybe a hundred or more owners, guaranteeing that there would always be one there for you.

And, planes are getting more simple to fly, even in bad weather, every day. The new GPS systems with color moving maps make it brain dead easy to find your way around.

Anyway, I'd buy one. And screw the airlines.

11 posted on 03/06/2002 3:21:55 PM PST by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
"Pilots, if you're serious about your rights, it's time to take them."

Why just pilots?

Why not passengers? We have RIGHTS as well.

Somenthing about, "the right to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Will somebody explain to me how the FAA or for that matter, any government body can "legislate" our RIGHTS away.

12 posted on 03/06/2002 3:59:05 PM PST by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato;Britton J Wingfield
Any time a high government official or other high vis person flys commercial, it is a security risk. It makes that particular flight a more desireable target, and the average citizen passengers should protest.

Let'em fly in government or private aircraft.

13 posted on 03/06/2002 4:38:52 PM PST by KrisKrinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
As pilots, it is YOUR duty to ensure the safety of your aircraft - and the government won't let you.

It goes well beyond that. Does anyone remember the pseudo-strike (I think it was United or American) threatened back in the mid 80's. They didn't threaten to go on strike, they instead threatened to obey every Federal law to the letter. As I recall, the airline caved in to their demands very quickly.

I trust the pilots a lot more than I trust the Feds. (Why hasn't W fired this guy already?)

14 posted on 03/06/2002 5:45:47 PM PST by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Mineta is the token minority.

Mineta is the token DemocRAT.

Better in DOT than most anywhere else - except maybe as Surgeon General.

15 posted on 03/06/2002 5:48:54 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
hogtied by absurd bureaucrats

Mineta makes me physically ill. Remove him as SecTrans, give him a five-gallon bucket, and send him to Ground Zero.

16 posted on 03/06/2002 5:58:10 PM PST by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson