Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brookhaven; Leesylvanian;Polybius;sam_paine;McGavin999;mewzilla;Steve0113;GussiedUp;Thane_Banquo;
I understand the technical arguments, but I was talking about being practical.

None of you are "being practical" if you are arguing whether or not these guys understand the pros and cons of a Civilized International agreement from the 20th Century if we all know that these ragheads still eat, drink and sleep in the 13th Century.

NO, the Geneva convention does not apply to Al Qaeda!
-AND-
NO, the ragheads DO NOT CARE one way or the other! They will not treat our prisoners any better or any worse since we have no proof that they are even RATIONAL, much less CIVILIZED.

129 posted on 03/06/2002 9:42:57 AM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: sam_paine
None of you are "being practical" if you are arguing whether or not these guys understand the pros and cons of a Civilized International agreement from the 20th Century if we all know that these ragheads still eat, drink and sleep in the 13th Century.

Well said.
133 posted on 03/06/2002 9:57:50 AM PST by GussiedUp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: sam_paine
None of you are "being practical" if you are arguing whether or not these guys understand the pros and cons of a Civilized International agreement.....

I think that my rabid dog analogy in Post #118 is what you can practically expect from these organisms.

I would not expect a rabid dog not to bite if given the chance. Likewise, I do not expect Al Qaeda to refrain from killing an "American infidel" whenever they have the chance.

140 posted on 03/06/2002 10:06:59 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson