Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
But the Founders of OUR nation wanted to put a stop to that practice (of king's wars);hence they designated CONGRESS as having the sole authority to declare war.

Too bad that earlier generations of Congresscritters allowed an imperial Presidency to come into being, starting with Lincoln.

I am not a conservative as much as a reactionary : a conservative is simply one who wants no more change, whereas a reactionary would like to turn back to earlier ways.

Being a strict Constitutionalist is not very popular with conservatives or liberals.

26 posted on 03/04/2002 1:53:47 PM PST by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: hoosierham
However, if the writers of the Constitution wanted to prohibit military action absent a declaration of war, they would have written it that way. Nothing prohibits Congress from authorizing the POTUS to use force absent a declaration of war. Its just not there so I don't understand where you would roll back to.
27 posted on 03/04/2002 2:11:31 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson