Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1L
All of the examples you gave involved non-adults. I have no problem with laws affecting those seventeen-and-under, because the federal government accepts their non-adulthood in every (law-abiding) circumstance. I'm asking why a person accepted and treated as an adult by the federal government in every other situation is treated as less-than in this one
29 posted on 03/04/2002 11:18:39 AM PST by truenospinzone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: truenospinzone
All of the examples you gave involved non-adults.

Reread. The voting age involves adults. Further, it doesn't matter. My point was that different situations call for different solutions. Where in any law is an "adult" defined? Why are you assuming that if one has the right to vote and enter into a contract, he is an adult, but one that has the right to drive is not (keep reading before you respond)? Yes, adult is generally accepted to mean 18 or over, but the law itself doesn't make any distinction. It simply says: drive at 16; vote and contract at 18; drink and buy a handgun at 21. If you disagree with those ages, that's fine, but it would be arbitrary to say there should be a distinction between driving and voting age, but none between voting and drinking age.

59 posted on 03/04/2002 11:45:13 AM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson