No you didn't "get" me, but you did get me to laugh a little while sitting at my computer. Bible reading by myself, along in my room, is my constitutional right and does not have an affect on anyone else's lives whatsoever. Over the age of 21, I have no problem with people drinking their lives away. But the underage drinking laws are there for a reason. In this case, state government is the moral restraint that stops a lot of drunk driving accidents from happening.Suppose a 20 year old drinks in his own house, and doesn't cause any effect on anyone else. The same argument applies. Although, it's a little odd to see the same argument about Bible reading people usually use for vices.
And you keep using reasons for the 21 age that apply to people over 21. Why don't we stop a 22 year old from driving drunk?
"Suppose a 20 year old drinks in his own house, and doesn't cause any effect on anyone else. The same argument applies. Although, it's a little odd to see the same argument about Bible reading people usually use for vices. And you keep using reasons for the 21 age that apply to people over 21. Why don't we stop a 22 year old from driving drunk?"I was replying to southern rock. I never said that drinking laws do stop 22 year olds from driving drunk, that is illogical. What I was saying, however, is that underage drinking laws stop a lot of irresponsible teenagers from driving drunk.