Okay, since you asked.
I supported Alan Keyes in the Primary and Dubya in the General. I voted for him and I dissagree with Pat on many issues, the only issue I can think of that I am firmly in Pat's corner on is immigration, and that's just because he's the only one talking about it.
It's like the elephant in the living room, completely invisible to everyone else. Aside from this issue, I was not, am not and will not be a pirchforker.
Good comparison.. Perhaps you should look at the atrocities in China before making it however.
They openly threaten us, knock down out plane and hold hostages, are dying to invade their neighbors, persecute christians, crush their own students with tanks, force abortions (and get mad when we won't subsidize them via the UN, BTW) and sell arms to terrorists.
I have. And I do every time before I make a purchase, be it tooth-picks or computers.
Neuharth dances around the answer to his own question in the title, and no one has picked up the answer in this thread.
The reason why China is "OK," but Cuba is the "'enemy'" (interesting, I just noticed that he puts "enemy" in quotation marks, as if that is someone else's word," but "OK" is not in quotation marks, as if he approves of that term) is because China has more clout. It's as simple as that . . . and hardly a reason to lift the embargo on Cuba. Neuharth was so intent on establishing "equivalency" (typical liberal misdirection) because he wants you to disregard the strongest counter-argument to his position.