There would be charges brought against him if he left those children unattended in a hot car.First, that would be activity he was directly responsible for. That same analogy cannot be drawn in this case.
Second, I am not disputing his culpability in not yanking those kids the hell away from her if he knew she was as much of a loose cannon as she was. My point is that he cannot and should not be charged on the same level as she as it was not he who drown them.
He should fry too.
In a perfect world, she would have drown him and then killed herself and none of this would be necessary.
She did it and should pay. However, he KNEW how sick she was. She tried to off herself not once but twice. She walked around with matted hair and stinking and he thought the kids were safe with her? He didn't care about anybody but Russell Yates. You don't leave your children with a suicidal crazy woman if you love them and are concerned about their welfare. The fact that he could remarry and have more children is frightening. He should have to do some time or have some type of punishment for child endangerment or neglect. The sicko is now hoping to get rich and sue the medical community. The fact he could get one dime off the murder of his children is sick too. I am interested in those facts coming out too. Did he take her to every follow up appointment? Did he follow doctors instructions? They keep records, so I will be very interested to see that unfold as well.