Replies

A little bit of the famous "list-o-links" (so the creationists don't get to start each new thread from ground zero).

01: Site that debunks virtually all of creationism's fallacies. Excellent resource.
02: Creation "Science" Debunked.
03: Creationi sm and Pseudo Science. Familiar cartoon then lots of links.
04: The SKEPTIC annotated bibliography. Amazingly great meta-site!
05: The Evidence for Human Evolution. For the "no evidence" crowd.
06: Massi ve mega-site with thousands of links on evolution, creationism, young earth, etc..
07: Another amazing site full of links debunking creationism.
08: Creationism and Pseudo Science. Great cartoon!
09: Glenn R. Morton's site about creationism's fallacies. Another jennyp contribution.
11: Is Evolution Science?. Successful PREDICTIONS of evolution (Moonman62).
12: Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution. On point and well-written.
13: Frequently Asked But Never Answered Questions. A creationist nightmare!
14: DARWIN, FULL TEXT OF HIS WRITINGS. The original ee-voe-lou-shunist.

The foregoing was just a tiny sample. So that everyone will have access to the accumulated "Creationism vs. Evolution" threads which have previously appeared on FreeRepublic, plus links to hundreds of sites with a vast amount of information on this topic, here's Junior's massive work, available for all to review: The Ultimate Creation vs. Evolution Resource [ver 15].

"A scientist can tell you how night turns into day, but he can never take the wonder away." -- Paul Stookey

Evolution in and of itself is a faith system. The most knowledgeable (and honest) evolutionists will admit that there are too many gaps in evolutionary theory, and "leaps of faith" are necessary to hold it together. Many of the so-called "proofs" of evolution are simply interpretations of evidence based on preconceptions (i.e., "bias"). Evolution isn't true science, because it cannot be subjected to the scientific principle (experimentation, and arriving at predictable results). In this sense it's a pseudo-science.

In "Sphere," author Michael Crichton wrote, "...What we call 'science' actually consists of a rather arbitrary conception of the universe..." And Leo Tolstoy once wrote, "According to science, you are a randomly united lump of something." That's neither a very satisfying answer, nor is it correct.