[Ol' Sparky]

What a silly article, typical of the New York Times. The theory has more holes than a dozen doughnuts and, not surprisingly, a biased, left-wing newspaper rambles on like evolution is fact. No, evolution is a lame theory without a sufficient fossil record that contradicts scientific observation throughout human history (like in regard to mutations).

[onedoug]

What would constitute a sufficient fossil record? ...Uh, taking in uniformitarianism
and cross-cutting relationships, of course.

[billybudd]

What are the "holes" in the theory? It seems pretty reasonable to me. Evolution is not a "theory" - it's natural process which happens constantly. Maybe you'd like to question specific theories about the way humans developed, but to just claim that evolution doesn't exist is silly. What do you think happened for millions of years on this earth? Everything just stood still, and all of a sudden, humans pop up?

[NittanyLion]

No, evolution is a lame theory without a sufficient fossil record that contradicts scientific observation throughout human history (like in regard to mutations).

How so?