However, you have told us that you disagree with our "T", so why go on? You would believe that our basis is incorrect, thus why any more effort?
I do note that you dismissed our "T" out of hand, but didn't bother to tell us why. That doesn't do anything in promoting understanding.
Here is where we stand: The Calvinist says that "Natural Man is totally sinful and does not ever WANT in his own spirit to know Christ". The non-Calvinist says, "No he isn't!". The Calvinist then says, "Without understanding the true state of sinful man it is meaningless to discuss how that sinful man obtains salvation". Stalemate.