Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Utah's Changes May Be as Fleeting as Olympic Glory
The New York Times ^ | 2/24/2002 | MICHAEL JANOFSKY

Posted on 02/25/2002 1:47:13 PM PST by Utah Girl

Spires of the Mormon Temple rise next to a downtown Salt Lake City office building that has been wrapped in a poster promoting the Olympics. The Games, which the city spent millions to acquire, ended Sunday.

For nearly three weeks, downtown streets here, normally deserted after 6 p.m., were crowded well into the night. Store signs spoke in a rainbow of languages. Public squares were filled with exhibitions and entertainment.

The Winter Olympics, a jewel that cities spend millions to acquire, transformed Salt Lake City, bringing it a rich diversity of culture and languages to lift it into the league of cosmopolitan centers. Downtown felt more like New York or Paris than Salt Lake's poky old self.

"I've never seen Salt Lake City quite like this," Brian Challis, an artist from a Salt Lake suburb said the other day, marveling at the throngs walking the streets. A ticket scalper from Manchester, England, who gave his name only as Simon, stood on a busy corner and said, "Seems like this is America's hidden secret, doesn't it?"

But is it, really? What happens now? What happens with the show moving on, visitors leaving and traditional issues, like Utah's $200 million budget deficit, nudging their way back into view and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which agreed to a muted role during the Olympics, moving back to the forefront of daily life?

During seven years of planning, state and local leaders looked longingly into their Olympic future, half promising, half hoping that Salt Lake's 17 days with destiny would change forever the profile of a city known best as the Mormon capital of the world and of a state known widely for its staggering conservatism and homogeneity, owing to the influence of the church.

Yet it remains far from clear to what degree, if any, those enduring aspirations might be achieved.

Some buds of change are evident. New roads, light-rail lines and hotels reflect part of the $4 billion in construction that preceded the Olympics. Gov. Michael O. Leavitt, a Republican who predicted the Games would bring new businesses to the state, spent much of the last two weeks squiring around venture capitalists, promoting Utahans' work ethic and high educational level.

Utah ski resorts, which have often played second fiddle to those in Colorado, have now been seen by a television audience of several billion, an almost certain boon for local tourism. Tourism officials say the competition sites built for the Olympics, like the luge and bobsled runs, could turn Utah into a winter sports center.

"This is a launch, not a landing," said Mr. Leavitt, assessing the effect of the Olympics on the region.

But all that reflects a potential economic effect of the Olympics, which concluded tonight. Harder to predict is whether they might serve as a sociological crowbar, opening Utah to new ideas through culture and political shifts.

As one of the fastest-growing states, with a population of 2.2 million, Utah remains fiercely Republican. Its only Democrat among three members of Congress, Representative Jim Matheson of Salt Lake City, was the bull's-eye of a redistricting plan that diluted his concentration of Democrats to make him vulnerable to a Republican challenger this year. The Utah Legislature is overwhelmingly Republican, as are almost all judges and county officials.

Most of them are Mormon, reflecting a church to which 70 percent of state residents belong. In addition, almost 90 percent of state residents are white.

As a result, any change that would dent majorities is viewed with a high degree of apprehension. Chic and diverse, such as they are in Utah, play well only here in Salt Lake City, where just fewer than half the 181,000 residents are Mormons, where voters have elected a Democrat as mayor, Ross C. Anderson, and where the populations of minorities like blacks, Hispanics, Asians, gays and lesbians are growing.

Some experts predict that by drawing in tens of thousands of outsiders, the Olympics will transform Salt Lake City and Utah.

"The Olympics are now part of the state's history, and they are going to have an impact," said Theresa Martinez, a professor of sociology at the University of Utah. "Whether the L.D.S. church wants it or not, they will lead to a new openness and consideration of the more liberal side of things."

Still, evidence suggests that even in the state's largest city, change comes only grudgingly. At the downtown Nordstrom department store here, racks upon racks of women's designer shoes were displayed with great prominence these last few weeks, but their shelf life was short.

"They were brought in just for the Olympics," a sales clerk said last week. "On Monday, they all go back to the West Coast."

Some economic signs are not encouraging, despite the nightly crowds. Mr. Challis said sadly that the gallery on Main Street that he has been sharing with other artists for the Olympics is scheduled to return on Monday to its former self, an unoccupied storefront. Business owners outside the downtown ring complained steadily that they accrued little benefit from so many visitors to the city.

Only time will reveal which snapshot of the last few weeks might foretell the future of the city and state. Taking the bright side, Ms. Martinez suggested looking at Utah like "a dull, awkward child" suddenly energized and polished by the possibilities of life.

"The liberal elements have always been here," she said. "That's going to receive new fuel and strength from all this, and I think the L.D.S. church will be transformed, as well."

As for residents of the state, she was less certain the Olympics would alter their politics. Noting that so many visitors had a good time in a safe and festive atmosphere, she said the locals might take that as a positive reflection of themselves.

People here, she said, "want to be accepted, it goes so deep. I'm sure they are feeling, `Wow, aren't we proud?' and maybe now they have a sense that other people might like them, after all."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: olympicslist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Pfttt. Perhaps the NY Times would have all of us who prefer a quiet lifestyle go move to an Amish village (Rocky Anderson's suggestion the other day.) And the NY Times smacks all of religious conservatives through this piece, not just LDS conservatives.

If a state is predominantly conservative, why then of course, we must be sociologically backwards. And of course, as a result we fear any change. Well, we fear change that brings the problems that the big cities such as NYC has. We're not going to compromise our principles just so that the NY Times loves us.

And I take it as high praise indeed, that the only chic and diverse people live in SLC. The rest of us Utahns are redneck hicks...And the Nordstrom store is a test site for shoes for all Nordstroms, so the shoes were probably going back anyway. Yup, Nordstroms makes us wear clunky, unfashinable shoes...

And I have to laugh. The leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints suggested in 1997 that the members need to be politically diverse, that some of us should be Democrats. Right after their comments, the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke, and hmmm, nothing has been said since. Utah has a proud history of having many Democrats in office, it is the Democrat party that has moved, not Utah.

And this crack New York Times reporter failed to recognize the building in the photo with the ice skater on it is the Church Office Building, which is owned by...the LDS church.

1 posted on 02/25/2002 1:47:14 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: olympics list; Tis The Time''s Plague; Pete-R-Bilt; Excuse_My_Bellicosity; Technocrat; Lokibob...
To find all articles indexed using "Olympics List"
  click here >>> SL 2002 Olympics <<< click here  
SL 2002 home page...(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)


2 posted on 02/25/2002 1:51:51 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
The only thing that is going to change around here is diapers. And Rocky Anderson. Must get rid of him. Apart from that, this place rules and anybody who messes with it is my political enemy.
3 posted on 02/25/2002 1:56:40 PM PST by Technocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
downtown streets here, normally deserted after 6 p.m.

Man. Well, I wouldn't want to live there apparently, but you guys have fun :)

4 posted on 02/25/2002 1:59:12 PM PST by Hawkeye's Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawkeye's Girl
LOL, the NY Times should have come down to Provo, where I live. The sidewalks roll up at 6 PM and the streets are deserted. I drove downtown last week at about 10:30 PM, and it was deserted. Provo put on Olympics fun, free even, it ended by 10PM every night, and everyone just went home afterwards. SLC to us looks like the big city. :)
5 posted on 02/25/2002 2:06:22 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
UG, I wonder if you might know the name of a SLC establishment that has temporarily slipped my mind. It's a Mexican restaurant south of downtown which is not only huge, features Tex-Mex, but also has a big aquatic show every night all during din-din. Donny Osmond featured it as a "must" during a whirl around the state that aired on the Travel Channel.

Seems like it starts with an "M".

Michael

6 posted on 02/25/2002 2:22:37 PM PST by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
The Mayan in Jordan Commons. Great place, it is quite the dining experience. And there is a huge movie-plex there, like 24 screens.
7 posted on 02/25/2002 2:27:38 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
It's a pity that Utah (with it's 85.3% non-Hispanic white population)isn't as diverse as socialist Vermont (96.2%) or liberal Maine (96.5%) or Byrd's West Virginia (94.6%) or Dashchle's South Dakota (88.0%) or liberal Wisconsin (87.3%) or Wellstone's Minnesota (88.2%). Oops, how can those caring diverse states be less diverse than repressive Utah?

Well, maybe someday it can be as diverse as progressive Oregon (83.5%). But of course, those conservative Mormons will never be as diverse as Kennedy's Massachusetts (81.9%) or Rhode Island (81.9%). That 3.4% difference is just too vast.

Worse, Gore's Tennessee (79.2%)and hip Washington (78.9%) are beyond reach with their overwhelming 6.1% and 6.4% leads. How do the people in Utah live in such a terrible close-minded world?

By the way, the US number is 69.1%.

8 posted on 02/25/2002 2:53:02 PM PST by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LenS
Thanks for those stats!
9 posted on 02/25/2002 3:06:03 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
They come straight from the US Census 2000.

US Census 2000 Gateway


Towards the right middle, just pick a state. From the state options, just go down to Demographic Profiles and choose Table DP-1. At the top right hand column, under the Hispanic or Latino and Race category, there's a line for White Alone. Of course, the info can probably be found in a number of other places since the Census is churning out all sorts of Tables and Charts.

10 posted on 02/25/2002 3:21:01 PM PST by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LenS
I think the NY Times was slamming conservatism as much as religious conservatism. But that site sure give me ammo to fight the liberals with...
11 posted on 02/25/2002 3:22:36 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Actual real numbers often embarass liberals. Right now I'm reading The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World by Bjorn Lomborg. It's statistics are damning for much of the environmental movement's hysterical claims.
12 posted on 02/25/2002 3:29:38 PM PST by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LenS
How is that book? I've heard of it, the environmentalists seem to be ignoring it along with the media. His facts sure give the lie to the environmentalists claims.
13 posted on 02/25/2002 3:31:22 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
If SLC post Olympics is anything like Atlanta's the population will start to increase dramatically. People from all over the world have seen a "better" place to live and will move there.
Atlanta has gone through tremendous growing pains since the Olympics. Population growth is not as much a problem as the size of the growth in such a short ammount of time. Get ready SLC!
14 posted on 02/25/2002 3:35:50 PM PST by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine
We're hoping people will come here just to ski and then go home. It will be interesting to see how Utah's population will be impacted by the exposure from the Olympics.
15 posted on 02/25/2002 3:37:10 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LenS
The New York Times was hoping the Olympic Games and the influx of all those visitors would make Utahans more... (gasp) LIBERAL!!! Dream on. For people in the Red Zone States, its a question of values, not affluence. Even evangelical Christians will stop knocking Mormons for once on here since they embody family values, hard work, and virtue like no where else in the country. No one even comes close to how people live in Utah. And for the NYT the state's not so much a model for America as its a poster child for every thing liberals hate and fear about a Red America. Worst piece of biased reporting for the eastern Big City newspaper I've ever seen. Utah will go on just as it has always done without the need to bask in the seal of approval from the hoity toity liberals of the New York Times.
16 posted on 02/25/2002 3:37:17 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
It's pretty decent. Not too bad a read, despite it really being more of a textbook (352 pages of text plus 82 pages of footnotes, 71 pages of bibliography, and 10 pages of index). It's an impressive piece of collating environmental research. Heck, he even knocks Al Gore around for faulty premises. I think that I'll put it on next year's Christmas & Birthday lists so I can have it as a reference for future arguments with environmentalists.
17 posted on 02/25/2002 3:40:34 PM PST by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
I have been to Utah many time, tho only as a tourist, soaking up the beauty of Zion and Bryce Natl Parks....but watching these Olymics, I did not realize how absolutely beautiful the mountains there are....For some reason or another, I just did not envision Utah as being so mountainous in some regions...it was a pleasant surprise for me...And I live up here in Western Wshington among the beauty of Mt. Rainier, and the Cascade range...

On my visits to Utah, I have found the people to be nothing but warm and friendly, the scenery beautiful, and the crime to be low...

No mattter where one lives, there are pluses and minuses...better to concentrate on the pluses, than crab about the minuses...

18 posted on 02/25/2002 3:40:53 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
The whole premise of the article is stupid. Why would a two-week event change any city or state? It was a very expensive advertisement for the place that the city orchestrated, and they used it to justify a bunch of government projects like light rail, etc.

But after everyone has left, what has really changed? How many St. Lake residents are ever going to try out the bobsled run or ski jump?

Nothing is going to change. It didn't change any previous city. Heck, if anything, it was bad luck for Sarajevo. They became ground central in a civil war.

St. Lake City isn't going to have any permanent change as a result of this. And that's a good thing, because the people there like it the way it is.

19 posted on 02/25/2002 3:43:51 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom
You must come and see the mountains! They are spectacular. And I'm glad NBC finally showed some of southern Utah on Sunday. The whole state has such different views and geography. And I too prefer to focus on the positives in life. I find that harping on the bad in life makes me cranky, and then I see nothing good. I'd rather be happy.
20 posted on 02/25/2002 3:44:02 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson