The article stated they checked their results. If that didn't meet statutory requirements don't you think Al Gore's lawyers would have pointed that out in some legal brief before any one of a myriad of courts?
"Did you know that the Civil Rights Commission you mentioned earlier actually found the exact opposite results of what you posted? Here's the report itself. Read it and make up your own mind about what it says."
" ... it is impossible to determine the extent of the disenfranchisement or to provide an adequate remedy to the persons whose voices were silenced in this historic election by a pattern and practice of injustice, ineptitude and inefficiency."
Did you read where the report stated it is impossible to determine... That tells me that they couldn't find any evidence to support the argument.
"Did you know that the GOP worked to include clearly illegal absentee ballots in Republican counties, some of them up to six days late, while striving to exclude late absentee ballots from Democratic counties? Gore never tried to disenfranchise the military. He never objected to a single military ballot that was legally cast. He should have done more to oppose the clear GOP ballot fraud in Republican counties. Read this link, and be sure to check the scans of late ballots. Disbelieve your own eyes if you wish, but this is documented history."
If that was true why did some lawyer from Al Gore's campaign mail out a letter of instructions to those counties on how to count military ballots, in apparent conflict with Florida's consent agreement with the Fed's?
"Did you know that the Supreme Court decision which installed Bush as president was so transparently faulty, even to those who wrote it, that they included a clause saying that Bush vs. Gore could never be used as a precedent for any future case? No wonder no one wanted to sign their name to it."
What does that prove? Maybe it had to do with the fact that no one before Gore tried to count votes in violation of the 14th amendment?
"Did you know that the NORC study showed that in any state-wide recount, using ANY standard, Al Gore won?"
Using any standard would have been in violation of the 14th amendment though wouldn't it? The study also stated that the only way Gore would have won would be to count overvotes which have never been counted before.