Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Bill
>The estimate is to small by at least a factor of ten.

I'd love to see the source of your data. I'm looking for some more good global BC population sources.

51 posted on 02/24/2002 7:29:48 AM PST by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: LostTribe
A wild guess, with a basis in reality. In order to sustain genetic viability a certain population density is required.

Historians always over estimate the size of armies and underestimate the population. Example in Roman Republican times the Army was four Legions and an equal number of allies, more or less. A legion was about 5000 men between 18 and 45, with a 16 year four campaign obligation, this speaks of a high population density. The Frogs in the 16th century had a standard, more or less, army size of about 25,000 and they could put 3 regional armies in the field, not for long, the Spanish could do the same, again more or less.

In Sargons time the standing army was approximately 3000, as far as we can guess, with levies maybe 15,000 max. When you look at the number of people to support these troops, you can guess about the number of people that support them. For every man on the line it takes 50 to a hundred to support them, 0-80 years old.

52 posted on 02/24/2002 10:25:44 AM PST by Little Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson