Posted on 02/21/2002 2:11:01 PM PST by dhuber
Bill makes water users pay for annual permits
By Pamela Rigaux, News-Post Staff
ANNAPOLIS — A measure proposed by the Glendening administration would require almost anyone who withdraws water from a river, stream, spring or well in Maryland to buy an annual state permit.
The requirement would apply to farmers, orchardists, industries and municipal water systems, and would impose fees based on the amount of water used. Only users of less than 10,000 gallons a day would be exempt.
About half of the new fees would be paid by farmers, according to the Maryland Department of the Environment. The amount of the yearly permit charges has not been determined, but an MDE spokesman said a fee of $500 has been suggested for those using between 10,000 and 50,000 gallons a day, $1,000 for those using between 50,000 and 1 million gallons a day, and $5,000 for using more than 1 million gallons a day.
MDE spokesman John Verrico said water use permits would continue to be free and voluntary for users who draw less than 10,000 gallons a day.
The state's process of issuing permits would not change under the proposed bill, Mr. Verrico said. The change would be the addition of fees. No user would be "grandfathered in" and exempted, he said.
By MDE's accounts, about 14,000 permits are now in effect in the state. If the measure proposed by Gov. Parris Glendening's office becomes law, about 2,700 of them would have to pay annual fees. About half of those users would be farmers.
The bill would apply to orchards, dairy farmers, crop farmers, and wholesale tree and shrub operation. Businesses such as laundromats, pool water suppliers and miners and manufacturers that use water would also be billed, Mr. Verrico said.
Municipal water suppliers would also be included. Another part of the proposal would increase penalties for violations of sediment control, stormwater management, water pollution, water appropriation and use, waterway construction and obstruction and nontidal and tidal wetlands regulations, Mr. Verrico said.
The current fine of $500 per day would be increased to $25,000 per day with no caps.
"Right now the penalties are no deterrent. Someone can pollute, and the fine does not encourage them not to. It's easier to go ahead and pollute," Mr. Verrico said.
Money collected from the permits would go to conserve wetlands or be put into a fund the government will use in emergencies, he said.
Testimony on the Senate version of the bill, SB241, was heard Tuesday night by the Education, Health and Environmental Affairs Committee. A vote is expected later. The House Environmental Matters Committee will hear testimony on a companion measure, HB294 , next week, a committee spokesman said.
Area permit holders say even though they agree water is valuable, they do not want to have to buy it.
"The whole concept is ridiculous. Water belongs to the people and the state. We're given permission to use this water under appropriation. Now they're trying to nickel and dime us," said Jerry Faulring, owner of Waverly Farms, a wholesale architectural plant, tree and shrub business in Adamstown.
His land is irrigated, and he uses 115,000 gallons of water on peak days but averages less than that over a year. The fee, he said, is not going to break him. "The state will get a few million out of this bill and when you think how much work they will have to go through to round up those fees, it's laughable."
The "pocket change" will do little to help the state's conservation efforts, he said. Even if MDE wanted to find out who is using the water without a permit, they wouldn't be able to because they don't have enough staff to send out, he said.
A lot of people unknowingly use water without permits, he said. "The whole objective of the bill is to go for the people most easily identified, and that's us."
Alcoa Eastalco Works uses at least a million gallons of water every day in the making of aluminum, and the fees could be a burden, said Earl Robbins, public and government affairs manager, who went to Annapolis to testify. "When you go from a $1,000 to a $10,000 penalty, it's a trend that will scare businesses off," he said.
Anyone who deliberatly chooses to live or locate a business in this Socialist State is a damned fool.
Soon to come, air permits (don't breathe without one).
Private property is under attack by the socialists;NOTHING is to be owned by individuals.
This the non-point pollution regulations coming into effect.
Twenty years ago user fees were a conservative tenet. Has something changed?
EPA re-interpretated the Clean Water Act to allow for the regulation of run-off aka non-point pollution. It has been upheld by the courts. EPA sets the standards and each individual state sets the regs to acheive those standards.
Don't be surprise when you see rents being increased and prices of food at resturants being uped to pay for all of this. We have a become a society who is willing to let the government regulate our every move in order to obtain what we think is safety. We have become a bunch of socialist whimps who place no vaule on our freedom. All because we are scared. It is really a sad time in our history.
New research is giving farmers and environmentalists a clearer view of contaminants in local waterways.
In the past year, scientists with the UC Santa Cruz Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems collaborated with farmers to collect data on land use and its impact on nutrient contamination in the Pajaro River, Watsonville and Elkhorn sloughs.
The scientists tested nitrogen and phosphorous levels in the waterways every other week between Oct. 1, 2000, and Sept. 30, 2001. The testing was designed to get a spatial analysis of when and where these nutrients, which can be associated with agricultural runoff, enter the watershed.
They found that the Pajaro River is relatively contaminated before it reaches the Pajaro Valley, and that the nitrogen levels decrease some in Watsonville, most likely because the Pajaro River is diluted by cleaner water from Corralitos Creek.
Lead researcher Marc Los Huertos said that doesn’t mean excess nitrogen isn’t a problem, however.
"In Pajaro Valley, it’s probably leaching into groundwater," he said.
That would explain why it’s not as visible in the surface water. However, groundwater contamination could pose its own problems.
Jonathan Lear, a hydrologist with the Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency, noted that some wells in the Pajaro Valley have problems with nitrate contamination, including in the Springfield Terrace area north of Elkhorn Slough. And the study still showed nitrogen runoff in the Pajaro Valley, in addition to the high levels coming into the system from upstream sources.
The researchers emphasize these results must be viewed as the beginning of a long-term project to fully understand how land use, from agriculture to urban areas, affects local water.
Another study in the much wetter 1998 season, for example, found much higher nutrient flow into the streams.
Results from Elkhorn Slough showed a different problem. While Elkhorn Slough had lower levels of nitrogen, the waters were high in phosphorous. If the elevated phosphorus is related to farming, it could mean sandy soils in the slough don’t absorb phosphorous as well as their inland counterparts. Another possibility is that something else is bringing in phosphorous.
"Phosphorous loading may not be a farming-driven problem," said Los Huertos, explaining that factors such as horse droppings may play a role.
Area growers collaborated closely with the UCSC team during the data collection and several invited Los Huertos to monitor their fields throughout the year. Tom AmRhein and Mario Aguas of A&A Farms/Your Flower Garden have invited Los Huertos to their farm for several studies.
"If you want to control for nutrients, you’ve got to measure them," AmRhein said.
Traci Roberts, county coordinator for the Santa Cruz County Farm Bureau Agricultural Water Quality Program, hopes the new research will spark more interest in watershed management.
"We need to know what happens in our watershed," she said. "It makes it a lot more practical."
She hopes the dissemination of research results will recruit farmers to the process.
Daniel Mountjoy, a Salinas-based resource conservationist with the Natural Resources Conservation Service, thinks the research may have immediate practical benefits, too. By knowing how and when fields are leaching nitrates, he hopes to better understand when growers may be over-fertilizing.
"We can probably save them money if they know that they’re losing nutrients out of their system," he said.
Mountjoy thinks area residents could benefit from understanding what happens when they apply extra fertilizer to their home lawns and gardens. He notes that in areas on the East Coast where detailed studies have been done, it’s been shown that home gardens lose much more nitrogen per unit area than farms because home gardeners are less aware of the needs of their plants and less concerned with the cost of a little extra fertilizer.
Rep. Sam Farr, D-Carmel, who helped the UC researchers secure the USDA Special Programs grant that supports this study, is enthusiastic about the project.
"These funds go directly to local people who are solving local problems," Farr said. "Environmental monitoring and sustainable farming will help us preserve the delicate balance between keeping our agriculture productive and making sure that our cherished natural treasures are protected."
Water-friendly practices can be seen on A&A Farms off Elkhorn Slough Road: wide buffers between crops and the slough, vegetative cover on slopes and irrigation drainage designed to minimize erosion. In addition to AmRhein, many area growers have a history of managing their fields to protect local water quality. Ten such farmers have banded together to develop a certification program, working with researchers and the Monterey County agricultural commissioner.
Under the program, certified farmers will be able to use an eco-label on their products with the phrase "Fields to Oceans: Coastal Farmers Conserving Monterey Bay." AmRhein said that label is designed to identify responsible farmers, "so that when you buy product you’re getting something that’s done right."
The Central Coast Regional Water Quality Board is responsible for developing total maximum daily load guidelines for the Pajaro River, Watsonville and Elkhorn sloughs, among others. Those load guidelines quantify contamination problems in polluted waters and establish mitigation plans. They are required under the Clean Water Act and approved by the EPA. California contains 472 water bodies slated for load guideline development within the next 13 years; 46 are in the Central Coast region, which spans from San Luis Obispo to Santa Clara County.
The Pajaro River is listed as high priority for load guidelines development because of nutrient and sediment levels. The Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board is preparing to submit its updated plan to the state. Under the new plan, the Pajaro River guidelines will be completed by 2005, including a plan to mitigate problems and monitor progress. Watsonville and Elkhorn Sloughs have medium and low priority rankings, respectively.
The scientists presented their findings at the Second International Nitrogen Conference on Science and Policy last October and will summarize them in upcoming issues of the Santa Cruz County Farm Bureau bulletin.
Lead researcher Marc Los Huertos will present the research at the Monterey Bay Regional Ag Expo & Agricultural Seminar at 1 p.m. Tuesday. The Ag Expo, which includes sessions today and Tuesday, is being held at the Kennedy Youth Center, 2401 E. Lake Ave. in Watsonville.
Contact Robin Krieger Mejia atrmejia@pacbell.net.
http://www.aranagulch.org/
More sites about: California > Santa Cruz > Science Organizations
http://www.coastal-watershed.org/index.php
More Results From: www.coastal-watershed.org
RCD Watershed Information Sharing Project
... to foster and expand the Coordinated Resource Management and Planning (CRMP) Program's
role in watershed enhancement and expand throughout Santa Cruz County. ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.