Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince Charles of England Secretly Weds Camilla Parker Bowles at Post- Dinner Ceremony
Globe World Exclusive ^ | February, 26, 2002 | Now on the Newsstand Column

Posted on 02/21/2002 10:26:19 AM PST by codebreaker

Headline-Prince Charles Secret Wedding to Camilla Bowles and How They Kept It Secret


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: LibertarianLiz
I was hoping someone would bring that up. Didn't they keep the "boxes" away from him because they didn't think he could be trusted with the information?

It was his obvious sympathy to Nazi Germany that was the last straw for the Establishment. Britain has often been ill served by the Establishment, but they saved us from a terrible fate by dumping Eddie on his backside.

Regards, Ivan
61 posted on 02/21/2002 2:53:17 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
What kind of title could the Queen give Camilla besides 'Lady Harlot'
62 posted on 02/21/2002 5:28:41 PM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: matamoros;MadIvan
so then, who is a fine upstanding example of Royalty?

Elizabeth Tudor

63 posted on 02/21/2002 5:33:35 PM PST by mrs slocombe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
With a nic like this, and you don't know enough about English history and current facts, to say that the royals would have to get jobs , after being supposedly " kicked off " TITULAR positions ? Not bloody likely, dear. The Queen , without her royal stipens , is personally wealthy. Some royals do have " regular " jobs. And NO , even IF Parliment ( who won't ) got rid of the titular positions , now held by the royals, they still wouldn't be on par with the hoi polli.
64 posted on 02/21/2002 5:46:48 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: matamoros
I find it difficult to believe that any FREEPER could be THIS completely ignorant of historical facts ; however , you have disabused me of that assumption. Clearly, you haven't a clue, as to what kind of an idiot King Edward VIII was. The only " REAL " man ? He most assurredly was majorly flawed and in no way a " REAL MAN" !

Poorly educated, proNazi, supposedly sexually disfunctional, more interested in clothes than most women, scared to death to be King, cuckholded by Wallis, and all around jerk . That's your " REAL MAN " . Go read some books, before you prove just how ignorant you are, by posting junk .

65 posted on 02/21/2002 6:02:39 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
lol
66 posted on 02/21/2002 6:36:53 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson