The note in the jailed 'spy' in Canada story is the key. A copy of the note is at the above address. If it was written before 9-11, it is significant. If written after 9-11, Vreeland is a con man.
"The man telling the tale in sworn court affidavits is Delmart Edward Vreeland, who faces credit fraud charges in Canada and in the United States, where officials are attempting to extradite him."
Why would "officials" be attempting to extradict him if Canada is going to try him on the same allegations? The U.S. could file for extradition anytime after/during the "trial", couldn't they?
"In his affidavit, he says he tried to warn Canadian intelligence about possible terrorist attacks on New York and the Pentagon, along with targets in Ottawa and Toronto, but was written off as a petty criminal. So he wrote the warning on a piece of paper, sealed it in an envelope, and handed it to jail guards a month before the attacks. They opened the letter Sept. 14 and immediately forwarded the information to Ottawa."
It would seem that's very easy to verify. It's stated as fact that the guards forwarded it to Ottawa after holding it for a month and then reading it.