Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OKCSubmariner
"However, when I suggest that the FBI,CIA and Bush had forewarning and foreknowledge information (David Schippers & active FBI agents allegations) which if acted on MAY, I repeat, MAY have been used to avert the 9/11 attacks, that does not mean that I think that they deliberately had the WTC buildings attacked or allowed them deliberately to be attacked. Perhaps they had poor communications , individuals were incompetent or bad desisions and policies were in place?"

I'm curious if that reasonable line of thinking is permissable anymore. Guess we'll find out. This sure wasn't --- SPY CASE IN CANADIAN COURTS SUGGESTS US NAVAL OFFICER HAD FOREKNOWLEDGE

11 posted on 02/15/2002 12:19:01 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: rdavis84
I noticed they deleted your link. Guess they want to make the evidence go away.
12 posted on 02/15/2002 12:46:35 PM PST by KirkandBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: rdavis84
I'm curious if that reasonable line of thinking is permissable anymore. Guess we'll find out. This sure wasn't --- SPY CASE IN CANADIAN COURTS SUGGESTS US NAVAL OFFICER HAD FOREKNOWLEDGE

Interesting. I am glad now I saved a copy of the note that supposedly demonstrated advance knowledge of 9/11. This guy may be a con man, but if it can be proven that the note was written prior to 9-11, then there is something there worth looking at.

Of course that kind of talk can have you deleted.

17 posted on 02/15/2002 2:48:07 PM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson