To: tpaine
I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is not subject to the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. Presumably, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics delimits the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. From C1, it follows that relational information is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of grammarians. It must be emphasized, once again, that the notion of level of grammaticalness is not to be considered in determining the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34). It may be, then, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction cannot be arbitrary in nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.
To: Texaggie79
Are you aware your weird cut & paste 'answers' make you look like a fool?
But feel free to continue..
293 posted on
02/19/2002 4:05:45 PM PST by
tpaine
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson