Replies

Nope, I didn't say that. I said that you are limited in your remedies but that you could have him evicted under the deeds and covenants of your community. If what he is doing is deemed a "public nuisance" because it's in full view of the whole neighborhood, that might be a different story, but you have a tendency to want to peep into the neighbor's windows, it seems to me.

WRT law enforcement officers who use their police powers to "enforce" unconstitutional edicts, they SHOULD be punished and that much more harshly than any other perp, because the boys and girls in blue are acting under color of law in their depredations. And the politicians who give them their marching orders should be equally penalized. The ones who act properly and do a CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROPER job of keeping the peace are to be commended and supported! I would back up one of these folks ANY time! Do you see the difference? I made it clear in the original post, except to you, I guess.

However, BATFags and the DEA and even the Feebs have no constitutional basis for EXISTENCE, as the Constitution prescribes only THREE crimes that fall under Federal jurisdiction outside of a military reservation or the District of Columbia, treason, piracy and counterfeiting. Which "duties" of the BATFags or the DEA or FBI fall into the prescribed categories? And since the Secret Service is charged with investigating counterfeiting, it seems to me that it could be expanded to include treason and piracy as well. These are not, that I can see, "growth" crimes so it might work out well!

So you think that my neighbor should be able to do these things in his front yard for all to see?

If you think you've been harmed by another person take it before a court and impartial jury.

"No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him."
--Thomas Jefferson to Francis Gilmer, 1816. ME 15:24

How and why individual rights prevail over the illusion of group rights.
The smallest minority is the minority of one -- the individual. When the individual is protected all larger-than-one minorities as well as the largest majority are protected. The largest majority is the human species.
Whenever possible, absolutes are preferred to relatives. Absolutes are constant across all cultures and times whereas relatives change from culture to culture and generation to generation or century to century.
Absolute: The highest moral, human and individual right is the right to self-defense against the initiation of force, fraud and coercion. The proof is that without one's own life a person has nothing, nada, zero, zip.
Absolute: Every instance that force, fraud or coercion is initiated against a person that person experiences a loss of value to his or her life. Only the victim knows how much his or her life was, is and will be diminished by the person that wielded initiation of force, fraud or coercion against him or her.
When plaintiff decides that arbitration will not meet plaintiff's needs, trial by jury is the best recourse that a plaintiff has for gaining restitution for plaintiff's life being diminished by the initiation of force, fraud or coercion.
The plaintiff must convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that he or she has been the victim of initiation of force, fraud or coercion by the defendant. Also, plaintiff must express the loss of value plaintiff suffered and express what plaintiff seeks in terms of restitution or compensation for plaintiff's loss of value.
Here's a short, partial list that a plaintiff might bring charges against a person whom the plaintiff claims victimized him or her. All cases can be settled via trial by jury.
Plaintiff claims defendant initiated force, fraud or coercion against plaintiff by:
Defendant killed person that is close relative or close friend to plaintiff. This is a logical choice of who would be first in line to become plaintiff. E.g., spouse, child, sibling, etc.
Defendant assaulted victim
Defendant stole from victim
Defendant blackmailed victim
Defendant ingested drugs
Defendant sold drugs to third party consenting adult
Defendant viewed pornographic material
Defendant sold pornographic material to third party consenting adult
Defendant sold sexual favors to third party consenting adult
Defendant engaged in gambling with third party consenting adult
The burden is on the plaintiff to prove to a jury beyond reasonable doubt that he or she has been the victim of initiation of force, fraud or coercion and to what extent the plaintiff has been damaged by the defendant.
The bottom line is: if the jury agrees with you/plaintiff you're right and win the case. If the jury disagree with you/plaintiff you're wrong and lose the case.