I agree completely. The threat of force does not make people moral. I was just saying that the same applies to the Libertarian morality of "no force, no fraud" : if you refrained from fraud only because of the threat of force, you would still be immoral. And you would still question the right of law enforcement to threaten you with that force.
To make matters worse, once people begin to assume law is morality, they believe anything legal is moral.
Conservatism, in my view, is about matching the law as closely to morality as possible. There will never be a perfect match, and people should be made aware of this, but it is wrong to forbid things that are no immoral, or allow immoral things to be done unpunished.
(I hope Roscoe will not consider this correction as a racially motivated attack on Hispanics!!!) ;-)
"Everything not prohibited is mandatory"
Sorry, but I had to say it.