Santa Barbara Libertarians help win Boy Scout discrimination fight

LP News ^ | February | LP

[Texaggie79]

The courts want nothing but a finding of the facts from the jury.

Then work on fixing that.

[Texaggie79]

You live in a dream world.

Why is it that when I speak of Constitutional principles I live in a dream world?

[AUgrad]

Then work on fixing that.

Working.

[tpaine]

Since the 14th amendment, no state may abridge, deprive or deny persons of life, liberty, or property, without due process.

No matter how many wild witchcraft excuses you pull out of your silly butt, you can't deny that fact.

Let's see..... I have the founders actuall ACTIONS to back up my assertions.

-- Witchcraft laws are your back up? How pitiful.

All you have is some excuse for why our founders had no backbone to stand up against laws that violated rights which you claim they saw us having.

That statement is incoherent, -- but the 14th is not 'some excuse'. It's enforcement, by states, using it against the feds, could become the last best hope of saving our constitution, imo.

[tpaine]

It's self evident. - You don't know beans.

[Texaggie79]

Self evident? This from someone who can't see that legalizing hard drugs in our society would be after legalizing grand theft auto.

[tpaine]

Incoherence becomes you.

It is slightly better that your attempts to reason.

[Texaggie79]

It appears that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics cannot be arbitrary in the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that relational information is not quite equivalent to problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. On our assumptions, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial suffices to account for irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. Thus a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is unspecified with respect to the strong generative capacity of the theory. Suppose, for instance, that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.

[tpaine]

Bafflegab in, gibberish out.

[Texaggie79]

I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is not subject to the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. Presumably, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics delimits the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. From C1, it follows that relational information is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of grammarians. It must be emphasized, once again, that the notion of level of grammaticalness is not to be considered in determining the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34). It may be, then, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction cannot be arbitrary in nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.

[Zon]

You can choose a jury when convicted for drug possesion.

 A little slip of the statist tongue? ;^)  I don't do drugs so how about choosing a jury before conviction, okay?

It is the job of every juror to vote you innocent if they see that the law is immoral or unconstitutional.

When you think you've been harmed by someone it's your job to press charges and take the person/defendant to trial before an impartial jury. You agree with that, right?

[Texaggie79]

You agree with that, right?

Indeed

When a cop sees someone robbing a home, should he just take the persons license plate down incase the homeowner wants to press charges when they get back?

[tpaine]

Are you aware your weird cut & paste 'answers' make you look like a fool?

But feel free to continue..

[Texaggie79]

But feel free to continue..

Why? Are you so bored that you are reading them all?

[Zon]

When a cop sees someone robbing a home, should he just take the persons license plate down incase the homeowner wants to press charges when they get back?

A cop in the moment must assure himself to what degree of confidence he has in his belief that the person is robbing the home. The degree of confidence increases or decreases with new information. Such as how the suspect responds as the cop approaches and several other criteria are considered as new information is introduced. Once assured that the suspect is robbing the house the cop arrests the suspect.

If you see a person selling hard drugs would you be harmed, and if so, how would you convince a jury that the defendant harmed you?

[Texaggie79]

If you see a person selling hard drugs would you be harmed, and if so, how would you convince a jury that the defendant harmed you?

My family would be harmed by such as substance being sold in my neighborhood and any jury you can pull from my state would convict em in a hearbeat.

[tpaine]

NO one is reading them aggie. -- Why are you posting them thus becomes the question. -- And we all know that answer.

You can't defend your position on the constitution, so you punt nonsense.
How funny, yet sad.

[tpaine]

Your unsupported whine that your kids were 'harmed' is BS.

Show us the harm.

[Zon]

My family would be harmed by such as substance being sold in my neighborhood and any jury you can pull from my state would convict em in a hearbeat.

How had you been harmed and how would you convince a jury?

[Cultural Jihad]

Lunatics who claim that the government plans to force people into inter-racial marriages, for example.

The ideologues always try to use hyperbole. "We have to allow, and thereby give our societal imprimatur to, perversion, prostitution, promiscuity, pornography, obscenity, adultery, homosexuality, sodomy, and abortion, because otherwise, they (whoever this mysterious and ominous 'they' is) might outlaw puppies, or daisies, or saying the Rosary!" In other words, the ideologues are really just moral-cowards.