[ElkGroveDan]

This article was relatively good. Most of the stuff I read this morning is incessantly focusing on the abortion debate. That's all the reporters at the convention wanted to talk about.

Reporters think its great that Republicans are divided on the issue, though they never point out that Democrats are just as divided. The only difference is that public dissent is not tolerated in the RAT party, so you never hear about it.

It's too bad that they woudln't cover the other stuff, because Bill Simon had the most to say on ALL of the important issues voters care about -- the issues where Davis and his Demonrat-controlled legislature have nearly ruined our great state over the past three decades.

I am probably one of the most prolife people in the state, but the question has been answered. Bill Simon has the best credentials on the issue, Riordan is the worst. Now lets get on with all the OTHER issues that will decide the election.

Simon For Governor!

[Gophack]

It's too bad that they woudln't cover the other stuff, because Bill Simon had the most to say on ALL of the important issues voters care about -- the issues where Davis and his Demonrat-controlled legislature have nearly ruined our great state over the past three decades.

You're so right! I was so frustrated that the liberal press kept harping on abortion when education, the economy, transportation and energy are so much more important ... and what people are thinking about. Hopefully, the people will realize what the press is up to!

[Canticle_of_Deborah]

I was thinking this morning, why do they even invite those liberal reporters to the debate? Couldn't the people that sponsor the debates find ANY conservative or even moderate radio/TV personalities to ask questions? It seems like all the lib newspapers have one token moderate or conservative for 'diversity's sake'. By the way, that chick in the red last night needed to lose the hat:)