Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Afghan Victims of U.S. Bombings Demand Compensation
Tehran Times online edition ^ | 02/13/02

Posted on 02/13/2002 4:46:48 PM PST by invaderzim

KABUL -- Victims of the ongoing U.S. bombing campaign in Afghanistan gathered outside the U.S. Embassy in Kabul Wednesday to demand compensation for their losses.

Among the victims were 21-year-old Aziz Ullah, whose left leg was sliced off by a piece of flying shrapnel, and 34-year-old Abdul Bashir, who lost "my beautiful daughter" when a bomb exploded near where she was playing in the street in October.

Orfa Abdulahmad, meanwhile, tearfully told reporters how she had lost eight members of her family when her home was hit by a wayward bomb soon after the air raids began on October 7, AFP reported.

The demands for compensation come amid a new outcry over the civilian toll of the bombing campaign.

Afghan officials have said a CIA missile strike last week in eastern Khost Province killed three poor villagers, not Al-Qaeda fighters as the Pentagon has suggested.

The victims outside the embassy on Wednesday suffered their losses during the early stage of the bombings, which are aimed at destroying the Al-Qaeda network of Osama bin Laden, the Saudi-born dissident accused of masterminding the September 11 terrorist attacks.

The U.S. government has set aside one million dollars to pay medical expenses of Afghans who have lost limbs in the bombing but the funds, to be distributed through the U.S. agency for international development, have yet to reach Afghanistan.

Marla Ruzicka, program coordinator for the global exchange non-governmental organization which is behind efforts to pressure the U.S. government to compensate victims of the bombings, called for the immediate establishment of a 20-million-dollar fund.

"The victims need homes now. Aziz Ullah needs a leg now. They can't wait months and months," she told the gathering.

Ruzicka, 25, added that 20 million dollars was less than the 30 million dollars spent each day by the U.S. government on bombing Afghanistan.

One survey carried out by a U.S. researcher said there were at least 3,767 civilian casualties between October 7 and December 6 alone. Other independent estimates have put the toll at around 1,000.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: globalexchange; green; marlaruzicka; medea; medeabenjamin; traitorlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
Ungrateful?

We rid them of the Taliban and are going to help rebuild their nation, but I guess that is not enough.

How much could it cost to give them their so called compensation though? What could the average house in Afghan cost to rebuild, 20 or 30 US dollars?

Please! They have gained more than they have lost.

I suggest they hit up Osama and the Taliban for compensation.

1 posted on 02/13/2002 4:46:48 PM PST by invaderzim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: invaderzim
Victims of the ongoing U.S. bombing campaign in Afghanistan gathered outside the U.S. Embassy in Kabul Wednesday to demand compensation for their losses.

Surprised it took them this long.

Then again, look at the source of this story. I wouldn't trust an Iranian newspaper if they said Bill Clinton was a liar.

2 posted on 02/13/2002 4:49:47 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: invaderzim
The demands for compensation come amid a new outcry over the civilian toll of the bombing campaign.

This "outcry" is 100% typical socialist blather.

3 posted on 02/13/2002 4:56:22 PM PST by hauerf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: invaderzim
Why don't those lazy bums get off their butts, and hobble round picking up bomb fragments and recycle them??? Geez... where's the self-reliance of these "fierce, independent Afghanis" huh?
4 posted on 02/13/2002 5:00:06 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
Victims of the ongoing U.S. bombing campaign in Afghanistan gathered outside the U.S. Embassy in Kabul Wednesday to demand compensation for their losses.

However, finding only rubble and a few junk cars, the victims left the former embassy and wandered around aimlessly until they spotted a passing reporter...

5 posted on 02/13/2002 5:03:45 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: invaderzim
They lost relatives, homes and property, and you call them ungrateful? And you really think we are rebuilding their government to make it any better? Don't you know that the U.S. was the one who put the Taliban in in the first place? And the current "government" which the U.S. has installed is totally powerless and the people in charge are currupt warlords. Plus, it's not like these people asked us to get rid of the Taliban. True, there were those who didn't like it, but there were those who didn't like the previous government either, which is basically what it is reverting to.
6 posted on 02/13/2002 5:08:23 PM PST by kevlinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevlinsky
Don't you know that the U.S. was the one who put the Taliban in in the first place?

The Taliban marched into power after the anti-Soviet resistance (which kicked out the Soviet army with US help) collapsed into anarchy. The only way it could be said that the US "put the Taliban in power" was that it didn't hang around and do nation-building after the Soviets were kicked out.

But you know what? No one asked us to rebuild their nation. They only asked us for weapons to help them get rid of the Soviet invaders, which we did. Now we've helped them get rid of the Taliban curse.

Twice we've rescued Afghanistan. It's the American people that should be asking for compensation from the Afghan people. But of course we won't do that... cause we're the good guys!

7 posted on 02/13/2002 5:13:14 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: IronJack
Are we sure Jesse Jackson hasn't been over there stirring the money pot.
9 posted on 02/13/2002 5:19:35 PM PST by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kevlinsky
Don't you know that the U.S. was the one who put the Taliban in in the first place?

Not really. It was the Pakistani military and intelligence establishment. The US only funded the mujahadeen, some of which became Taliban, some of which became Northern Alliance.

And the current "government" which the U.S. has installed is totally powerless and the people in charge are currupt warlords.

The provisional government is a coalition of tribal leaders, military generals, and politicians from all sectors of the country. Hamid Karzai is certainly as capable of running the country as Mullah Omar, and considerably less tyrannically.

This is where you jump up on your perch and start cackling "It's all about oil. It's all about oil" like a benzedrine-fed parrot.

10 posted on 02/13/2002 5:20:05 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: invaderzim
Any compensation would be the start of another welfare state. These people need to get the message that they are responsible for themselves and backing a democratic unified government is the best "compensation" they could give themselves.
11 posted on 02/13/2002 5:23:22 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
And by us giving them weapons we pretty much put the Taliban in power. If giving Taliban weapons didn't suit our interests we wouldn't have done it. The U.S. knew it wasn't going to get squat in return, so if it shouldn't expect compensation in return. Now that the U.S. is removing the Taliban at the cost of many innocent Afghan lives (not like I cry a river, but this is to show we aren't really doing them that much of a favor) we begin to think that we did a good job.

But what do you think is going to happen? They've already started making the new government, and it is already evident that it is just a puppet, with the warlords in control. So perhaps it won't be a crazy Muslim nation, but I can assure you that it won't be much better.

12 posted on 02/13/2002 5:25:19 PM PST by kevlinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
This is where you jump up on your perch and start cackling "It's all about oil. It's all about oil" like a benzedrine-fed parrot.

LOL, I see I'm not the only one fed up with the "It's all about oil" crap.

13 posted on 02/13/2002 5:26:33 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SpeaksTruthToPower
So we should kill all Afghanis according to you. You can do that, it's not like I care. But don't expect them to be grateful in the end.
14 posted on 02/13/2002 5:26:49 PM PST by kevlinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: invaderzim
Give 'em each a giant bag of "fertilizer."
15 posted on 02/13/2002 5:27:35 PM PST by JamesWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: invaderzim
This is not representative of the Afghani people. One father who lost nine members of his own family in the war said it was worth it to see his country free. This reeks of Terry McAuliffe and James Carville. Probably an American trial lawyer (acting on behalf of the DNC "destroy Bush PAC") provided talking points and coaching, hoping to squeeze more $$$ from the US taxpayers. Didn't Dershowitz send memos to our enemies coaching them on their "legal rights" in case they were arrested for their terrorist activities?
16 posted on 02/13/2002 5:37:08 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: invaderzim
KABUL -- Victims of the ongoing U.S. bombing campaign in Afghanistan gathered outside the U.S. Embassy in Kabul Wednesday to demand compensation for their losses

Crowds like this inspire me to think like a Roman legionaire.

Machine gun the whole crowd.

17 posted on 02/13/2002 5:39:19 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevlinsky
We did not give the Taliban weapons. We gave weapons to the anti-Soviet resistance... the Taliban wasn't even an active part of that resistance. They came later, armed by the Iranians and maybe the Pakis and took over while the anti-Soviet resistance squabbled amongts themselves. It really had nothing to do with us. There are some bad things that happen in this world that aren't the fault of the USA. Hard for you to believe? Believe it.
18 posted on 02/13/2002 5:41:52 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
This is where you jump up on your perch and start cackling "It's all about oil. It's all about oil" like a benzedrine-fed parrot.

Don't put words in my mouth. This may be about oil, but I'd like to think that it is The U.S. needed to retaliate after WTC collapse, so it decided to attack somebody who it could place the blame of WTC on. True, the Taliban didn't want to hand over UBL, however, it probably didn't have the ability to hand over UBL even meant to be a show of power. if it wanted to. So what do we do? Bomb the &*@# out of them.

True, the U.S. didn't put the Taliban in place per se, but it did help set in motion events that allowed Taliban to get into power (and the U.S.'s role was fairly large; by providing weapons it allowed the guerrillas to attack helicopters, something that was until then the invincible weapon against them). The Taliban is just a government that is extreme in the opposite direction of the previous government. Whereas the last one was extremely corrupt, the Taliban was totalitarian. However, I don't think anyone can say that that Taliban was any worse than the previous government, mainly because the same kind of people are in power. We hear about stories in which Taliban tortured people to death, but I am sure that previous governments did the same things.

19 posted on 02/13/2002 5:42:41 PM PST by kevlinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
This reeks of Terry McAuliffe and James Carville. Probably an American trial lawyer (acting on behalf of the DNC "destroy Bush PAC") provided talking points and coaching, hoping to squeeze more $$$ from the US taxpayers. Didn't Dershowitz send memos to our enemies coaching them on their "legal rights" in case they were arrested for their terrorist activities?

You've got it, Ragtime Cowgirl. When looking for the lead vipers, start stirring the nests closest to home!

20 posted on 02/13/2002 5:43:28 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson