Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Selara
I don't know.

If I were to guess, I believe that it's Westerfield. I also believe that he is the source of the "swinging" rumours, trying to cover his own ass by taking attention away from himself, and directing it at the van Dams.

Who else would have "leaked" that information to the press? A law enforcement officer? Why? Releasing information like that can only hurt the investigation. "Swinger" friends of the van Dams would not do it either, out of self-protection.

The discjockey has either been lied to, or is himself lying about his source.

919 posted on 02/15/2002 1:12:30 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
If I were to guess, I believe that it's Westerfield. I also believe that he is the source of the "swinging" rumours, trying to cover his own ass by taking attention away from himself, and directing it at the van Dams.

That theory is not likely because the Van Dam's were questioned about it on national television. Now imagine, you are on national television to plead for the return of your daughter. Out of the blue comes questions asking if you are both swingers.

If you are NOT swingers, you just deny it and go on. If you ARE swingers, but do not wish to admit to it, but neither do you wish to lie....you deflect the question or chose not to answer the question.

923 posted on 02/15/2002 3:33:56 PM PST by Selara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 919 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson