Oh, really? Documented facts? Or just what you heard from someone close to the case? It's been awhile, so my memory might be wrong, but I seem to recall that it was mostly the latter. (I am sure you will correct me if I'm wrong, but if you do, please post the source.) And you were right, I might add. But I don't recall seeing the documens posted.
As for calling someone a liar--the civil thing to do is give someone the benefit of the doubt--people can be mistaken about many things, and it might not be an intentional lie. There are far better ways of handling it than resorting to name-calling. Usually, name-calling is a sure-fire indicator that someone has run out of debating points, and that's their last ditch effort to win the debate.
And how very compassionate of you to notice that a little girl's life is at stake while people worry about winning a debate. Yet, I don't exactly see you throwing in your hat. Perhaps I'll doubt your sincerity less once you do.
Maybe to you, but the media immediately reported that. Same day that Craig took the case, the local radio stations jumped on the story.
"Oh, really? Documented facts? Or just what you heard from someone close to the case?"
No, really, documented facts. I guess it's now you doing a bit of projecting here.
You can check the facts here if you wish.