A credible news reporter and law enforcement officer will not often risk their careers reporting "made up lies."
The neighbor under suspicion has also given statements on the Van Dams swinging and parties. Perhaps he is not as credible, as he is a suspect, but yet, that is another piece.
The Van Dams have not ONCE denied the allegations, only deflected the question, refused to answer the question, which indicates that it is most likely true. These type of anwers are given when the person does not want to speak a lie, but they also do not want to speak the truth.
Golightly is right. This is the proper forum for such speculation, pointing out discrepencies and the obvious. It is not a court of law here...but an exchange of ideas and opinions.
I don't know the discjockey from boo...and I have heard some whoppers from Dan Rather and friends. Last but not least, I don't know that I adhere to the concept that Law enforcement officers do not lie. They are human after all. Not only that, but the mere fact that he will not allow his name to be released is suspicious. Are these two (discjockey and "law enforcement officer) above reproach? These are accussations that border on slander, should our media people be allowed to spread these rumours out w/out accountability?
Funny, FITZ can find the fact that the van Dams have hired a PR frim suspicious, and he questions their reasons. But no one here questions a person who will sling accusations but demand to remain anonymous.