[MizSterious]

Luis, with all due respect, you're as judgmental as everyone else. You've judged those of us who feel the family contributed to the child's disappearance by their lifestyle. You've judged people who posted here for "not praying" for Danielle. (Alas, you hadn't done your research: many had been praying.) I don't know who will be most distressed at the Pearly Gates, though--those of us who judged the van Dams' lifestyle as deviant and harmful to their children, or the van Dams themselves, for not using any judgment at all.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"You've judged those of us who feel the family contributed to the child's disappearance by their lifestyle."

A) Please show me where I have done that, and

B) Please provide any sort of CONCRETE proof to the idea that their lifestyle contributed to the child's disappearance.

I understand being critical of the lifestyle, I don't understand trying to place blame on the parents based on that fact.

Simply the fact that they may have allowed strangers (I don't buy the strangers theory, from the swingers that I have known in my life, they don't allow strangers into their home) into their house would make anyone who has allowed service techs, movers, painters, wall paper hangers, delivery people, pest control techs, potential home buyers, sales people, etc, etc, etc. into their homes "bad" parents as well.