[harrym]

Well, it appears that their sexual habits may have been contributory to what happened to the child. This is another example of how our society has been corrupted by the liberals. "It's only about sex" is just as not applicable here as with X42's fiascos. It all about our society and its moral structure. There are consequences for ignoring the rules. The reason they have become rules is because the consequences of certain actions have been observed over a couple of thousand years and people say "oh, that type of behaviour brings bad consequences, let's make a rule that people don't do that". These days though, we "question authority" without researching where that authority developed its rules from.

[FITZ]

No matter how fun it might be or pleasurable or exciting, sex with people who don't know well can never be made safe. It doesn't matter if you're a streetwalker, a gay man leaving a bar with Jeffrey Dahmer, a woman getting picked up in a bar, or a nice couple wanting an orgy while their kids are asleep, it's not and cannot be made safe.

[HamiltonJay]

may have been contributory to what happened to the child

The operative word in that sentence is MAY it is a shame that many here, and apparently yourself, have turned that "MAY" into DID.... When there is nothing of factual basis to even support the parents even are swingers in the first place, much less that if they are that it contributed to their child's disappearance. Those of us who understand the meaning of the word MAY and MIGHT do not jump to conclusions by assuming they mean "DID".

If these parents DID place their children at risk, I will condemn them for it. But I am not going to do so based on some talk show host and internet prattle.