Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chookter
Note that the soldier didn't say that HE PERSONALLY would shoot the reporter -- only that the reporter 'would be shot.' In other words, there's a strong likelihood that you will be shot if you go into the middle of a battle scene! Same thing here in Oakland! :-/
40 posted on 02/11/2002 3:21:54 PM PST by Jerez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Jerez
Jerez said: "Note that the soldier didn't say that HE PERSONALLY would shoot the reporter -- only that the reporter 'would be shot.' In other words, there's a strong likelihood that you will be shot if you go into the middle of a battle scene! "

Be in no doubt. If the military guard believed that he was following lawful orders in doing so, he would shoot the reporter.

David New was a soldier who refused to wear UN insignia on his US Army uniform because he believed that the order was unlawful (expecting him to wear a uniform which represented allegiance to the UN ). He was court-martialed and found guilty of disobeying a lawful order. I believe that his case is nearing the US Supreme Court.

The expectation that soldiers will guard access to a battle zone is lawful. The soldier would have fired.

47 posted on 02/11/2002 3:33:07 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson