Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spectre
Lie-Detector tests keep coming up again and again. But they do not really detect lies - they only detect nervousness. Some people can lie without any indication by the equyipment while others nervously tell the truth and get a suspicious reading.

The main purpose of a polygraph is to help the authorities look for suspicious answers and then grill the individual on those points. If they are lying and belive the machine indicates that they are lying, they often confess.

A polygraph is basically a confession tool and nothing else. I would never consent to take such a test because if you pass it, it does NOT exonerate you and if the result looks like you are nervous (and who wouldn't be in that situation) then it brings on the appearance of guilt. There is no benefit in taking a polygraph test.

Gum

242 posted on 02/11/2002 7:50:54 AM PST by ChewedGum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: ChewedGum
I agree. I think there is good reason now to allow polygraph tests to be admitted in a trial. I have seen people refuse to take them and it did not make me think they were guilty or hiding something.

Same for taking the 5th Amendment. Why have rights if we are not going to exercise them?

245 posted on 02/11/2002 8:05:43 AM PST by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

To: ChewedGum
I didn't check my reply - It should have read that polygraph tests should not be allowed.
247 posted on 02/11/2002 8:21:35 AM PST by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson