Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mindprism.com
A driver's license does NOT infringe on one's right to travel. One is free to hire transport, or walk.

The "right to travel" does not imply that a particular MODE of travel is guaranteed to you.

12 posted on 02/08/2002 3:37:17 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
One is free to hire transport, or walk.

Do I have a (nonrevokable) right to use the public roads to walk or to cycle? Why?

Do I have a (nonrevokable) right to use the public property in a reasonable manner? Why?

PS 'nonrevokable' means: may not be arbritrarily revoked.

Are you conceding the the state may arbritrarily deny Drivers Licenses since driving is a privilege?

18 posted on 02/08/2002 3:50:35 PM PST by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
driving is a right not a privelage
20 posted on 02/08/2002 3:54:27 PM PST by The B Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
The "right to travel" does not imply that a particular MODE of travel is guaranteed to you.

You have a right to walk, but you do not have a right to wear shoes.

25 posted on 02/08/2002 4:05:55 PM PST by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
The "right to travel" does not imply that a particular MODE of travel is guaranteed to you.

Or access to taxpayer built and maintained public roads.

91 posted on 07/12/2003 11:33:46 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson