This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Posted on 02/07/2002 6:49:33 PM PST by Shethink13
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A routine Senate hearing degenerated into a personal spat on Thursday when a furious Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill sparred with Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd, the longest-serving member of Congress, over who grew up poorer.
``I started my life in a house without water or electricity so I don't cede the high moral ground to you of knowing what life was like in a ditch,'' O'Neill said in a tight voice.
``I started out in life without any rungs in the bottom of the ladder...I've had that experience and I can stand toe-to-toe with you,'' Byrd riposted.
The West Virginia senator then threw in a reference to an early controversy involving O'Neill, who initially resisted putting his huge personal stock holdings into a trust when he was appointed Treasury secretary but eventually did so.
``I haven't walked in any corporate boardrooms. I haven't had to turn millions of dollars into trust accounts -- I wish I had those millions of dollars.'' Byrd said.
``I grew up in a coal-miner's home and I married a coal-miner's daughter, so I hope you don't want to start down this road and talk about our backgrounds and how far back we came from,'' he added.
FIRE IN THE EYE
Asked later about one report that there were tears in his eyes during the heated exchange with the 84-year-old West Virginia senator, O'Neill shot back: ``That was fire.''
The spat began when Byrd took offense to a cartoon in the Bush administration's 2003 budget document, released on Monday, showing Gulliver tied down by Lilliputians, which Byrd said implied the interests of ordinary people were too minor to warrant consideration.
The silver-haired Byrd, renowned for his insistence that the White House show respect for Congress, then snapped: ``I've been here for 50 years (and) we're here to represent the interests of the people.''
Byrd branded the cartoon's inclusion in the glossy, photo-filled, flag-emblazoned budget document -- a departure from the usual plain-paper, plain-cover plan the White House usually produces -- ``nonsense.'' He added: ``A lot of us were here before you. You're not Alexander Hamilton.''
Hamilton was the first secretary of the U.S. Treasury, who served from 1789 until 1795 and who established basic economic policy for the United States.
O'Neill, a wealthy former industrialist, was clearly agitated by Byrd's manner and fired back: ``I've dedicated my life to doing what I can to getting rid of rules that limit human potential and I'm not going to stop.''
Sitting ramrod straight at the witness desk, O'Neill rejected any implication that he lacked empathy for ordinary working Americans and cited his own humble beginnings -- sparking the tit-for-tat over who grew up in the greatest poverty.
NOT THE FIRST TIME
Even after normal committee business resumed, the touchiness between O'Neill and Byrd did not die down.
As Republican Sen. Gordon Smith of Oregon led O'Neill through a series of gentle questions and said he hoped the Treasury secretary hadn't felt ``demeaned,'' he noted that O'Neill clearly didn't need the job.
Byrd quickly interjected. ``I don't need to serve here either. I could retire and get more money,'' he said tartly.
The exchange came at the start of O'Neill's fourth appearance on Capitol Hill this week to discuss and defend the Bush budget proposals, but it was by far the liveliest moment in the hearing. Veterans of the Senate Budget Committee took it in stride, though, especially Byrd's role in it.
``He's skewered witnesses before,'' a Senate aide said afterward. ``This is not a first.''
Nor is it the first tense moment between Byrd and the Treasury secretary, whose fondness for plain speaking has landed him in hot water with Congress before.
During a Senate Budget panel hearing last March, Byrd, a vocal guardian of Senate etiquette, took O'Neill sharply to task for interrupting Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow, a Democrat, as she questioned the Treasury chief about Bush's tax-cut plan.
That's about 40 years too long, you pompous old windbag! And furthermore, Mr. so-called Constitutional Scholar, you are a SENATOR therefore you are there to represent the interests of your STATE, the people are represented by their Congressmen.
Who does this SOB think he is anyway?
I wonder why. [/sarcasm off]
See actual comment here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/623899/posts
Look for 'Coloreds cannot enter here.' in Wash Post article.
Hey, Bobby-boy...go for it! ----Senile old coot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.