[ThinkLikeWaterAndReeds]

Let us assume for a moment that macroevolution does exist. Let us also assume for a moment that the big bang theory is true. Hold on there you creationists, don't click the "post reply" button just yet. Prior to the big bang, there must have been something to go BANG, and there must have been some mighty force to ignite that something that went bang. Let us also assume that the creator of that something and the ignitor of that something was a force that some have come to know as a GOD. This creative power (a GOD in this example) could have devised a scheme that we refer to as macroevolution, as the mechanism that leads to the human. The point of evolution where the human emerged could have well been preordained. This still would be creation would it not?

[realpatriot71]

Yes that would be creation. However, the creation account mentioned in the Bible tells of a fully formed man, not an evolved men.

[js1138]

Prior to the big bang, there must have been something to go BANG, and there must have been some mighty force to ignite that something that went bang.

This logic cannot be applied to first causes for the simple reason that you are merely pushing back the origins question. If God existed prior to the Big Bang, how did God originate?

The only honest answer is that no one knows. The same answer a scientist would give to the origin of existence.