Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: toupsie
but for its activities in forcing x86 manufacturers to buy licenses for Windows.

I've never figured out how Microsoft forced companies to buy their products. Did they use a gun? Or did they say "If you want this level of discount, you have to purchase this package of licenses"?

70 posted on 02/07/2002 6:28:56 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
I've never figured out how Microsoft forced companies to buy their products. Did they use a gun? Or did they say "If you want this level of discount, you have to purchase this package of licenses"?

Practically. What Microsoft did was to tell x86 manufacturers that they must buy a Windows license for every x86 machine they built even those that were not meant to have an OS when shipped. Also these contracts prevented the manufacturers from making "Dual Boot" machines. So if Compaq wanted to make a BeOS machine, they still would have to buy a Windows license from Microsoft. If they didn't, Microsoft would yank the all the licenses from Compaq. This what anti-Windows folks called the "Microsoft Tax".

71 posted on 02/07/2002 8:59:47 AM PST by toupsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson