Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time Is NOT on Our Side: President Bush is absolutely right.
Wall Street Journal ^ | February 5, 2002 | S. Elenchus - Critical Commentary on TJ Bray

Posted on 02/05/2002 12:35:43 PM PST by elenchus

Edited on 04/23/2004 12:04:11 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

THOMAS J. BRAY writes in today's Wall Street Journal that we should be patient with the terrorists. We have lots of time. America does not to strike preemptively. We are above that. In democracies, we do not strike first. We wait to be struck. To strike first is not gentlemanly. Even if the Islamic maniacs and the nations in the Middle East which sponsor their terrorism are all acquiring weapons of mass destruction--nuclear, chemical and biological, we should wait until they strike first. Not us. Let them show how inferior they are. Let us show how superior we are.


(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
No. Bray is a fool and a knave. We have precious little time left. President Bush is precisely right.
1 posted on 02/05/2002 12:35:44 PM PST by elenchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Clarification. The law of our survival is that the number of millions of Americans who will live is inversely proportional to the number of months we delay attacking preemptively; that is, the sooner we attack preemptively, the more millions of American men, women and children will survive.
2 posted on 02/05/2002 12:46:21 PM PST by elenchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
We cannot remain in a defensive shell. We must take the offensive. You and the President are right, time is not on our side, and hasn't been since the early 90's.
3 posted on 02/05/2002 12:46:34 PM PST by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Dear G-d...how many more innocent lives must be sacrificed to this utter stupidity....or is it more than ignorance but a wish to see America suffer more casualties. I'll not give this writer the benefit of the doubt.
4 posted on 02/05/2002 12:50:37 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Comment 1: They have already struck first. Their intentions are clear.

Comment 2: Why not wait? It worked for the Romans in the latter days of Rome, did it not? /sarcasm>

5 posted on 02/05/2002 12:53:33 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Comment 1: They have already struck first. Their intentions are clear.

Comment 2: Why not wait? It worked for the Romans in the latter days of Rome, did it not? /sarcasm>

6 posted on 02/05/2002 12:54:00 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: elenchus
I feel strongly both ways. The limiting case of "time is not on our side" is radicalism:
"Desperate ills are by desperate measures cured
or not at all." Shakespeare
On the other hand time wasn't on our side while Adolf Hitler was building up his forces, either. We have already allowed x42 to fritter away 8 long years and it is, in the words of the Dread Pirate Robert, "just work, work, work" to convince people that you mean business.
8 posted on 02/05/2002 1:03:11 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
****our Islamic enemies****

Repeat this over and over to yourself untill it sinks in. Our enemy is Islam. Period. Nuff said. Thinking otherwise is a fools diversion.

9 posted on 02/05/2002 1:05:44 PM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Cheer up. After we do the Muslims we can move on to the Rats.
10 posted on 02/05/2002 1:09:57 PM PST by hang 'em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just_another_man
Yes. Is it not reasonable to predict that for each month we delay, one million American men, women and children will die? One simple nuclear or smallpox attack can dispatch millions.
11 posted on 02/05/2002 1:13:26 PM PST by elenchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hang 'em
I'm for doing the rats first.
12 posted on 02/05/2002 1:22:03 PM PST by sinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
bray

Function: verb

intransitive senses : to utter the characteristic loud harsh cry of an ass; also : to utter a sound like an ass

transitive senses : to utter or play loudly, harshly, or discordantly

13 posted on 02/05/2002 1:40:59 PM PST by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
Yes; sounding not entirely unlike the bleating (or, bleating heart) of the sheep; a herd animal known to submit without the least resistance.
14 posted on 02/05/2002 2:03:38 PM PST by elenchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sinclair
Amen bro.
15 posted on 02/06/2002 4:57:52 AM PST by hang 'em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson