Black History Month: Why?: And the Ivy League’s misplaced emphasis.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This is one of those rare occasions when I feel the need to recycle an old column. My reasons are twofold, but I will give you three since NR is a traditionally Catholic magazine which encourages Trinitarianism in all things. First, I've got to go do something which would prevent me from writing a column today even remotely as good. Second, this column is about Black History Month which begins today. Third, this column elicited a very large, often angry, response when I first wrote it, and since a large number of my readers weren't around back then, I thought it would be okay to rerun it. I don't think it's dated, though the reference to "Selma" was of course a nod to Jesse Jackson's tendency during the Florida recount to mention Selma at every opportunity.

Also, since I have you here, let me throw one more thing at you. If you haven't been to "The Corner" yet, you really have to check it out. It is already, by far, the fastest growing, most popular new feature we have ever come up with (and that includes our "What Was the Sweatiest Movie Ever?" poll). For those of you who don't "get it," here's what it's about. Various NR editors and members of our extended family get to comment on anything we like, including each other's comments. We try to keep the posts short and the most recent appear on top.

There are no editors, no rules, and no master plan. Yes, as many, many, many readers have pointed out, it's very much like a blog along the lines of AndrewSullivan.com or Instapundit.com. The difference, however, is significant. Those guys run one-man operations. If you can't see the distinction, look at it this way. Sex with one person is very different than sex with more than one.

It is Black History Month. And who among us can say he is immune to the excitement?

The truth is, a lot of people feel that every month is Black History Month. And I don't just mean people like Jesse Jackson, who see "Selma" in everything from bad service in restaurants to Global Warming. Anyone who's looked through a college syllabus or high-school textbook in the last decade cannot honestly say that black history doesn't get a whole lot of attention.

For example, on a lark I decided to search the course offerings at Brown University. I searched for courses offered in the 1999-2000 academic year in which the words "black" or "African" appeared in the course description. Below is what I found (I deleted repeated courses offered in both spring and fall semesters, as well as courses in the hard sciences):

1. An Introduction to Afro-American Studies c 2. West African History
3. The Afro-Luso-Brazilian Triangle
4. Colonial Cultures in Comparative Perspectives: Africa, the Caribbean, the United States
5. Freedom in African Political Thought
6. Conflict and Ethnicity in Contemporary Africa
7. African Women's History
8. The Search for Black Identity in America
9. Africa in Anthropological Perspective
10. Imperial Unconscious
11. Cultural Encounters
12. Postcolonial Studies
13. Early French Language and Literature
14. Southern African History
15. North American Environmental History
16. Brazil and Africa in the Making of the Southern Atlantic World
17. Ethnic Conflict in Contemporary Africa
18. Refugees, Conflict and Socio-Political Change in Africa
19. Memoirs and Memory
20. African Cinema
21. Texts of Cruelty and Complicity
22. Nationalism, Modernity and Anti-Colonial Intellectuals
23. World Music Cultures (Africa, America, Europe, Asia, Oceania)
24. Introduction to Comparative Politics
25. Race, Class, and Ethnicity in the Modern World
26. Comparative Development
27. African Development and Demography
28. Black Lavender: A Study of Black Gay and Lesbian Plays, and Dramatic Constructions in the American Theatre
29. Comparative American Slavery
30. Black Leadership in Ethnic Communities
31. The Life and Work of W. E. B. Du Bois
32. Class, Culture, and Politics, 1865 to the Present
33. African-American Women Novelists
34. Writing and English Society, 1789-1832
35. Nationalism and Development in U.S. Literature: 1850-1950: Junior Honors Seminar
36. Black Cultural Studies
37. Romanticism and Empire
38. Red, White, and Black in the Americas
39. New "Independent" American Film
40. Rastafarianism: Philosophy, Theology, Politics
41. Black Theology

I don't want to insult anyone brimming with black pride, but let me say that I feel the above list certainly reflects an interest on Brown's part in covering the black experience with some thoroughness.

Then I searched for the words "American Revolution," and I found two course — one on military history and the other actually called "Era of the American Revolution." That's actually not bad, considering that the last time I looked, Yale wasn't offering even a single course on the American Revolution.

I continued my search. There were about a dozen hits for courses that had the phrase "Civil War" in their description, but about half of them were about the Russian, British, or Spanish Civil Wars. If you count non-literature courses mentioning the U.S. Civil War, there were three hits. Again, not bad for an Ivy.

Moving on, I searched for "Constitution" and got four results — two for Organic Chemistry, one for the aforementioned "Era of the American Revolution," and, of course, "Race, Ethnicity, and the Law in the United States, 1780-1900." That's it. I am referring to the U.S. Constitution here — just in case you think I must be referring to something else. I know, I'm thinking the same thing: No wonder so few Ivy League liberals seem to know what the Constitution says.

In the hope that you aren't exhausted with all this yet, let me quickly give you some other results. The number of courses with the word "Lincoln" in the description was zero. The Federalist Papers, zero. Winston Churchill? Zero.

Now, I don't want to denigrate courses like "Black Lavender: A Study of Black Gay and Lesbian Plays, and Dramatic Constructions in the American Theatre." You can draw your own conclusions. Here's the course description:

An interdisciplinary approach to the study of plays that address the identities and issues of black gay men and lesbians and offers various perspectives from within and without the black gay and lesbian artistic communities. Focuses on analysis of unpublished titles. Also includes published works by Baraka, Bullins, Corbitt, Gibson, Holmes, West, and Pomo Afro Homos. Some evening screenings of videotapes. Enrollment limited to 20.

Courses focusing on unpublished titles and the work of the black gay theater troupe Pomo Afro Homos are clearly worth every penny of Brown's $26,000 annual tuition. And if you agree, I'm please to announce that reading this column now costs five thousand dollars. Please send checks in care of National Review.

Of course, this sort of analysis is unscientific and maybe even unfair to the other side's argument. A critical race theorist (sorry, I don't know if I'm supposed to capitalize that; I think capitalized letters are tools of the pale penis people) would say that there are dozens of "mainstream" introductory or advanced courses that take subjects like the Constitution and the Civil War as givens or simply don't mention them in their course descriptions. I'm sure that is true. But we can be equally sure that many of those same courses also fail to mention blacks in their course descriptions but certainly talk about race a lot in the classroom.

And yeah, yeah, Brown may not be representative (I'm picking on Brown because it annoys me). To be honest I planned a completely different column, but I started late and got caught up spelunking around Brown's web site. But I'll tell ya, I've played this game with other universities and this is pretty typical. I invite you to go exploring at other schools yourself. It don't cost nothing. Let me know what ya find.

Anyway, it's not quite clear why we need Black History Month. Is it because (white) America needs to have its consciousness raised about black contributions to science, the arts, etc.? Or is it that black Americans need to have their cultural self-esteem raised about their own contributions? To be honest, it's very hard to tell sometimes.

Either way, the thing that bothers me so much about Black History Month is how much it feels like propaganda. Don't get me wrong, blacks have made great contributions to American life. But in a sense, so what? Why do we need to hear about it? I would be hard-pressed to list for you the no doubt numerous contributions of Finnish or Nicaraguan Americans, but it's not as though I would consider the Finns or Nicaraguans any less fully American if I found out they contributed literally nothing worth celebrating.

In this country, we do not keep score on ethnic groups. Although I guess it is interesting to point out that American Communists in the 1930s were disproportionately Finnish. Alas, they were also disproportionately Jewish, so what can you do?

Anyway, back to my point. It makes me very uncomfortable to see corporations and television networks celebrating ethnic groups. Maybe I'm the equivalent of an ethnic ACLU-er. Nativity scenes and menorahs don't bother me at all, but it bugs the hell out of me to have the federal government touting the resumes of one ethnic group or another. This sort of Volk propaganda is quite literally un-American, in the best sense of the word "American." Moreover, it's unnecessary and counterproductive. As my excursion into the case of Brown v. Traditional Education reveals, blacks get plenty of attention. And if I were the average white kid, I might conclude that blacks need Black History Month, a conclusion that feeds the racism it is supposed to combat. And, if I were a black kid, I might be insulted that blacks need their own quota of days set aside, in which many fine accomplishments are celebrated and many mediocre accomplishments are over-hyped to the point of embarrassment.

Now, I know there are a lot of liberals who disagree. But many of them subscribe also to the condescendingly racist notion that they are the stewards of black self-esteem. As for me, I think your self-esteem is your own business, and no amount of public-service ads will change that.

Sure wish they'd teach a little more history about the Constitution, our Founding Fathers, the wars that shaped our nation. It would be different if kids were taught that in public high schools, but, alas, it's absent there as well.

While we're at it, the Women's Studies courses, the Marxism courses, and the queer theory courses (their term, not mine) could use some rethinking as well.

They need a course in the history of societies that captured and enslaved other tribes and sold them to slave traders on the west African coast. This is a big part of their history - they should not forget that.

The scary thing is that "history" is too often now in the hands of liberal historians. What history that survives is too often the victim of biased perceptions.

We need more conservative scholars and more conservative journalists.

I e mailed this article yesterday to every school board member in my county. Every parent should inundate their local school board and school principals with their letters to speed up the forces for change. Let them know why many parents homeschool and send their kids to private schools. Let them know you are an activist and fund raiser. Bring their attention to the failings of the multiculturalist and diversity agendists and that foreign students should be inculcated with our history before our kids learn theirs. Let them know you insist on pictures of Washington and Jefferson and Lincoln on the walls. I could go on, but you get the idea.

I just looked at the online Yale course listings and they do have an undergraduate seminar on the American Revolution (History 444a), although why anyone would sign up for that when they could take "Animal Rights and Wrongs: Changing Attitudes toward Nonhuman Animals in the Light of Darwin" (History 442a) instead is beyond me.

This is what struck me when I walked in yesterday to sub a 3rd grade class:
(On FEBRUARY Month Event Schedule) BLACK HISTORY MONTH
But wait, wasn't JANUARY Black history month? - with students learning all about Martin Luther King Day and other Black leaders?

And then I saw a silhouette of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln on the schedule for President's Day. Not even their names mentioned. And are these two giants of men celebrated and studied in school? Any MEMORIAL SING-A-LONGS? COMMUNITY PRESENTATIONS?I don't know. The only thing that comes to mind when I hear these words now is the President Day's Sale at the Bon Marche or K-Mart.

We have ourselves to blame for this. And we should demand today that the men who built this country actually keep a place in her history. IMHO

believe it or not ordinary students and ex-students in the universities are starting to ask whether or not these universities are relevant at all. A lot of money is spent in the university, but many students feel the product offereed is garbage. A lot of students end up studying things that they later realize are worthless in that they were not personally enriched and they did not get a leg up in the job market from their university studies. But if you are a marxist professor, then you measure worth differently.

But if you are a marxist professor, then you measure worth differently.

Ain't that the truth.

Still, there is a role for scholarship. I just think it's time for a little perspective and balance. Not every course has to tilt so far left that it leaves those of us on the "right" side of the boat high and dry.

We have ourselves to blame for this. And we should demand today that the men who built this country actually keep a place in her history. IMHO

Absolutely. We need to take back our educational system. Even as a homeschooler, I care about what the fellow citizens my children will live with will know about our way of life.

While we're at it, you can't understand or study the history of Western Civilization without also studying the Bible, regardless of your religious persuasion. Another loss.

Another loss
Yes, I feel it more strongly every day. Last week when I was subbing, I was giving the kids a spelling test. I say the word, use it in a sentence, and they write the spelling. Anyway, the word was pew. Not bad smell, but pew, as in a bench. But not just any bench, a specific type of bench. So I said, "When I go to church I sit on a pew." I could hear one of the indoctrinated students go "Um...!" (As in "um, you said a bad word.") I looked up and told the students all I could say "church" if I wanted to and that that was the meaning of "pew", and to get on with their spelling.

All these different religions have countries attached to them. Shinto/Japan. Bhuddist/Thailand. etc... I don't go there and tell them to erase their history; to become "nuetral." And I don't want us to be neutral either. America was founded as a Christian nation, and I want that in my everyday life. At least the freedom OF religion. Now I am being told I can't SAY it. That is "freedom" (yeah, right) FROM religion. It is unconstitutional/wrong/harmful/. IMHO

Our company is going thru some rounds of layoffs, but the black history month council has had several meetings to prepare for their Feb. activities.

< /sigh> It's really frustrating - I just don't see how the black history month propaganda blitz benefits anyone.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.