My post 225 correctly refutes that.
In your post 247, you continue to try to claim that she said that it was the picture that was offensive which your own highlights from post 142 show to be in direct contravention to your claim, to wit:
I don't believe I said the picture offended me, it didn't.
Why do you continue to maintain that the poster says the PICTURE ITSELF was offensive, when it is obviously not the case?
Continuing-
Who knows, continued displays of this picture and discussion of its contents may put him in greater danger. That's what offends me.
If you take the italicized phrases out of context, and lump them together, then yes you are right
-- just like Bill Clinton and his minions were right.