Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another threat to national security
San Diego Union-Tribune Publishing Co. ^ | 1/31/02 | Joseph Perkins

Posted on 02/01/2002 10:23:46 AM PST by Jagdgewehr

President Bush identified border security as one of the key areas of homeland defense in his State of the Union address this week.

So key, in fact, that his 2003 budget proposes to spend nearly $11 billion to deter those who would steal into the country by land, sea or air.

Much of that 25 percent increase in the overall border security budget is slated to go to the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The agency is to bring a new entry-exit system on line to track the arrival and departure of non-U.S. citizens.

"This new system will dramatically improve our ability to deny access to those individuals who should not enter the United States," the White House promises, "while speeding the entry of routine, legitimate traffic."

Meanwhile, President Bush vows to round up non-U.S. citizens who entered the country legally, but who have overstayed their student, business or tourist visas.

"The INS estimates that 40 percent of people who are here illegally have overstayed their visas," the president noted in a speech last week in Portland, Maine. "And one of the things we want to make sure of is we find the 40 percent to make sure they're not part of some al-Qaeda network that wants to hit the United States."

That's great – as far as the president went.

But why stop at the 40 percent of illegals who've overstayed their visas? Why not go after the other 60 percent of illegals as well? The aliens who haven't overstayed visas because they never bothered to obtain them in the first place.

Yes, it particularly frightens that there are some 115,000 foreign nationals from Middle Eastern countries residing in the United States illegally (or quasi-legally in the cases of those seeking refugee status or political asylum).

But the INS should not concentrate exclusively on the 115,000 illegals from that part of the world, while ignoring the other 8.6 million illegals who hail from countries outside the Middle East.

For illegal immigration, in sum, is a threat to this nation's security. Particularly considering the recent Census Bureau report revealing that the population of undocumented immigrants in this country more than doubled during the 1990s.

The explosion of illegal immigration is a result of the United States government looking the other way as millions of foreign aliens brazenly violated our immigration laws.

And, even now, the federal government is not talking about about cracking down on all these foreign lawbreakers, but those who've overstayed their visas? And then, primarily, those who come from the Middle East.

There should be equal treatment of undocumented immigrants no matter what their country of origin. If a foreign national is in the United States unlawfully, he or she is a criminal. And the lawbreaker should be subject to deportation.

What we have now is government policy that tacitly decriminalizes illegal immigration. That actually rewards those who have infiltrated themselves within our borders (that is, unless they have the misfortune of being born in the Middle East).

Indeed, as recently as last summer, the president was hoping to offer amnesty – the White House preferred the term "permanent legal status" – to the 3 million Mexicans living illegally in the United States. The idea was scrapped after the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

But that hasn't stopped states from moving forward with measures benefiting undocumented immigrants. Like the new California law that allows "undocumented" students to pay in-state fees at Cal State universities as well as state community colleges.

And just last month, the University of California regents voted to allow certain non-U.S. citizens to pay in-state tuition at the state's top universities.

So an undocumented immigrant who manages to enroll at one of the University of California's eight campuses would pay less than $4,000 a year in tuition. Yet, the son or daughter of one of the U.S. citizens who died at the World Trade Center or the Pentagon who enrolls at a University of California school would pay out-of-state tuition of roughly $15,000.

It doesn't make sense.

The president is talking about getting tough on immigrants in this country who overstay their visas. Meanwhile, California is getting soft on undocumented immigrants by offering them in-state college tuition rates.

So much for securing the homeland against foreign infiltrators.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
So an undocumented immigrant who manages to enroll at one of the University of California's eight campuses would pay less than $4,000 a year in tuition. Yet, the son or daughter of one of the U.S. citizens who died at the World Trade Center or the Pentagon who enrolls at a University of California school would pay out-of-state tuition of roughly $15,000.

California - The golden gateway in the erosion of America's security.

Time to "light up the border!"

1 posted on 02/01/2002 10:23:46 AM PST by Jagdgewehr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr
If Bush had the pelotas to stop the welfare crap there wouldn't be a border problem.
...'course then he wouldn't have a reason to play Big Brother and expand the federal government.
damn
2 posted on 02/01/2002 10:30:56 AM PST by KirklandJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr,sabertooth,Hugh Hewitt,RonDog,Buckeroo,Mercuria,GeronL
Question to the FedGov: which other federal laws "don't really count" and can be ignored with impunity?

Ignoring the breaking of countless laws by millions of illegal aliens swamping our nation makes a mockery of all laws.

If the INS was run like the BATF, aliens would be shot by SWAT teams one day after their visas expired.

This dual standard: killer SWAT teams for shotguns 1/4" too short here or too long there, but no enforcement at all of the laws broken daily by millions of foreign invaders makes a joke of all of our laws and is a prescription for lawlessness and anarchy.

3 posted on 02/01/2002 10:33:07 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KirklandJunction
If Bush had the pelotas to stop the welfare crap there wouldn't be a border problem

Even if Bush moved in that direction, California (People's Republic of...) would continue to reward the unlawful trespassing by providing benefits courtesy of the California taxpayer.

Not to mention extending equal status with legal residents of the state/nation.

4 posted on 02/01/2002 10:53:52 AM PST by Jagdgewehr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I have the impression that the state and federal government believe that I, a gun(s) owner, am far more dangerous than the problem of an unsecured border.

(understatement)

5 posted on 02/01/2002 10:59:58 AM PST by Jagdgewehr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr
Sounds like a California problem!
All yours! You want more guards at the Tijuana border, use California money.
6 posted on 02/01/2002 11:03:18 AM PST by KirklandJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KirklandJunction
Sounds like a California problem!

Well...yes and no.

The above mentioned problems with the state of California extending status and benefits equal to that of a legal resident is a "California problem".

However, the ease in which these individuals get across our borders is a national problem.

1 in 10 that are caught by INS are of middle eastern origin.

All yours! You want more guards at the Tijuana border, use California money.

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but, is not the Border Patrol/Customs federal agencies?

Would it not be in the nation's best interest to secure this section of the border?

7 posted on 02/01/2002 11:23:41 AM PST by Jagdgewehr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr
How much would a legal alien have to pay?
8 posted on 02/01/2002 11:30:44 AM PST by Jamten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KirklandJunction
"Sounds like a California problem! All yours! You want more guards at the Tijuana border, use California money."

Wrong! It's your problem too. I live in Texas, and we have illegals that cross the Rio grande. Most stay in Texas, cause it affords close proximity to Mexico. A substantial number move on to other states including: Kansas, Tennessee, Kentucky, Arkansas, Florida, Colorado, Oklahoma, and many others. It's your problem too!

9 posted on 02/01/2002 11:32:55 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jamten
Roughly $15,000.
10 posted on 02/01/2002 11:39:19 AM PST by Jagdgewehr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr
No doubt about it. Illegals will work under minimum wage, but you and I with guns....that just won't do.
11 posted on 02/01/2002 11:44:24 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
"If the INS was run like the BATF, aliens would be
shot by SWAT teams one day after their visas expired."

Had to reprint that one. Ain't it the truth.


12 posted on 02/01/2002 12:15:58 PM PST by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
If the INS was run like the BATF, aliens would be shot by SWAT teams one day after their visas expired.

Maybe we should redefine the ATF's role then. As much as I hate those idiots, this might be their 'best and highest' use at the moment.

13 posted on 02/01/2002 12:19:48 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
It's the truth! Or even like the IRS.
14 posted on 02/01/2002 12:25:35 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
No, I would rather see the BATF run like the INS.
15 posted on 02/01/2002 12:30:04 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson