Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur; chkoreff
"A free-trade zone between the Confederate States and Europe would have been a disaster to the Union's tax revenue, since the South was paying nearly 90% of all tariff money received by the federal government"

"Sorry, in 1858-59 more tariff revenue was generated by Boston ($5,133,414.55) than by the 10 largest southern ports combined ($2,874,167.11). And New York generated almost 7 times as much revenue as Boston ($35,155,452.75)."

The threat to the Union's tax revenue of a free-trade zone between the Confederacy and Europe was not limited to the loss of Southern tariff money, whatever proportion it may have been of total tariff revenue. All of the latter was threatened. European shippers would have significantly shifted the destinations of their exports from Northern to Southern ports. Numerous Northern editorial writers wrote of this threat in an effort to scare up popular support for war from a largely indifferent general population in the North. The port of New Orleans was considered a particular threat because from there the Mississippi would give traders of imported European goods access to an enormous number of potential buyers. Small wonder that the capture of New Orleans was a first priority.

49 posted on 01/31/2002 9:16:09 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Aurelius
And had the confederacy opened up as a free trade zone then how would those goods have made it from the southern ports to the Northern customers? What would have prevented the North from slapping a tariff on them as they crossed the confederate-United States border?
51 posted on 01/31/2002 9:22:02 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson