Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I reserve judgment. I'm working on the second time through the NIV. A lot of people take issue with it. At Mass, there are certain gender neutral modifications but not to the basic core issues. Some may be okay. The term "man" was a universal reference to all humanity. There are a lot of people who don't read that word that way any more. The key is not what version you read but that you read the Bible. The ones which twist the core meaning get no support from me... but language has to be somewhat fluid.
23 posted on 01/28/2002 6:24:30 AM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Mercat
Better read this about the NIV. It is a bad translation
82 posted on 01/28/2002 7:13:20 AM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Mercat
The term "man" was a universal reference to all humanity. There are a lot of people who don't read that word that way any more.

Since when...bout 1960? Why was it OK from about 70 AD till then? Seems appropriate though...rewrite history...rewrite the Bible. Wonder what God thinks about it?

/Sarcasm off.

134 posted on 01/28/2002 10:25:40 AM PST by Mojo-jo-jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson