To: Carl/NewsMax
Damn, it's starting to look like maybe the "tin foil hat" crowd might not be too far off the mark on this one. Interesting.
3 posted on
01/27/2002 11:45:51 AM PST by
oldvike
To: oldvike
Damn, it's starting to look like maybe the "tin foil hat" crowd might not be too far off the mark on this one. Interesting. The only possible way they could be right is if the tape showed an explosion. That seems doubtful: Nov. 12, the day of the crash, was a cloudless day in New York, a fact that makes that "puff of white smoke" particularly problematic for investigators who have bent over backwards to ignore the accounts of dozens of eyewitnesses who say they saw a midair explosion and fire before the plane broke apart.
There's a pretty vast difference between a "puff of white smoke", and "midair explosion and fire," Mr. Lamebacker's efforts notwithstanding.
So if this is all NewsMax -- itself a tinfoil-leaning group -- can say, then the tinfoilers are as wrong as they usually are. Note that none of the details add up to anything that a loss of the vertical stabilizer cannot explain.
6 posted on
01/27/2002 11:57:51 AM PST by
r9etb
To: oldvike
Ah, yes, the tinfoilers have scored another direct hit. Strange, isn't it?
To: oldvike
Just a dance. Had to suppress the info for the Christmas time airline traffic. Now perhaps the "truth" will come out--timed for limiting damages to airline profits. Ask Mrs. Daschle.
26 posted on
01/27/2002 2:49:31 PM PST by
Shermy
To: oldvike
Damn, it's starting to look like maybe the "tin foil hat" crowd might not be too far off the mark on this one. Interesting.Tin foil hats might be the new fashion statement, in our modern cover-up society.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson