Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California: Davis caught between energy generators, PUC chief on contracts
Sacramento Bee ^ | January 18, 2002 | Dan Walters

Posted on 01/18/2002 6:46:28 AM PST by John Jorsett

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:32:11 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The final day of any state legislative session, with lawmakers and lobbyists frantically trying to finish business before the clock strikes midnight, tends to produce bizarre political confrontations -- but few surpass what happened in the Assembly last September.

Sen. Jackie Speier, D-Hillsborough, was pushing a controversial bill that would bring non-utility power generating plants under the purview of the state Public Utilities Commission. But the chairman of the Assembly's utilities committee, Los Angeles Democrat Rod Wright, a political ally of utilities and generators, was demanding major amendments.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: calpowercrisis; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 01/18/2002 6:46:29 AM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calpowercrisis
Index
2 posted on 01/18/2002 6:54:59 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
FYI
3 posted on 01/18/2002 10:22:01 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP;eureka!;John Jorsett;calgov2002;randita;SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01...
Thanks for the ping!

To find all articles tagged or indexed using calpowercrisis

Click here: calpowercrisis

To find all articles tagged or indexed using calgov2002

Click here: calgov2002

4 posted on 01/18/2002 12:00:01 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett;Impeach98;evil smoker, stonecoldGOP;Gophack; StoneColdGOP; toenail; Impeach98...
Oh, this is a most interesting article !

Davis is in a pickle for sure!

5 posted on 01/18/2002 12:08:32 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
If the PUC gets control over the non-utility power generators, then Davis will be one step further to his fascist California Power Authority becoming a viable reality. It will also have a chilling effect on any plans for future plants within the state.

Interesting, though, that Calpine was close to reaching a deal to renegotiate contracts with their political pal, Gray Davis. I don't own stock in that sorry company and never will, but if I did, I'd consider suing the company if they gave away value to save Davis' political hide.

6 posted on 01/18/2002 12:10:08 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I believe there are plenty of Calpine/Enron 'tentacles'. I'll try to find and 'link' a few.
7 posted on 01/18/2002 1:08:14 PM PST by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
gov gray maybe a one-term gov.
8 posted on 01/18/2002 4:25:18 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; broomhilda
"Davis is in a pickle" I'd say, he is burnt toast!
9 posted on 01/18/2002 5:08:15 PM PST by TwoStep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
California: Davis caught between energy generators

Good. Crank up the juice. He needs enlightenment. Of course, the sparks from his hair would be amusing too.

10 posted on 01/18/2002 5:16:41 PM PST by Cachelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Buck Turgidson
Without a PUC-approved rate agreement, the state cannot issue a long-stalled, $12.5 billion energy financing bond;

The issue of this bond was initially supposed to occur last May, but it has been continually postponed because Dave, the PUC and the Legislature cannot agree on what's going to guarantee the bond. They're still at loggerheads, as this article indicates.

12 posted on 01/19/2002 6:41:40 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I don't own stock in that sorry company and never will, but if I did, I'd consider suing the company if they gave away value to save Davis' political hide.

Great point. Curious minds want to know: What's in this for Calpine? What benefit accrues to them by renegotiating these contracts?

13 posted on 01/19/2002 6:43:35 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: randita
It's hard to know. Renegotiation by itself does not necessarily mean lower profits. You can restructure a contract many ways that might lower current payments but put the value someplace else. An extension, for example.

But given Calpine's incestuous relationship with the Davis Administration, I suspect the company was trying to get some political favors out of it, perhaps by having Davis shut out some competitors, or fast-tracking some permits for Calpine.

I'm just speculating, of course. But I think the company is sleazy, and I know Davis certainly is.

14 posted on 01/19/2002 7:54:27 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All; SierraWasp
Thanks to John for posting this and to all for their on target replies!

SW, remember my remark in early May last year about CalPine Stock. It looked good, sounded good and would have been good if it was not such a buddy/buddy with Facist Davis!

You kidded, me about my reluctance to buy this stock. One of my better financial decisions for 2001!

A company that is in bed with Facist Davis will likely end up like the companies in bed with the bent one after X42, the bent one, left office!

15 posted on 01/19/2002 11:27:13 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
"You kidded, me about my reluctance to buy this stock."

You took me far more seriously than I ever expected! However, the blame for Calpines southerly direction recently, has a lot more to do with being unfairly lumped in with ENDRUN!

I just thought, and still do, that the company is not only aggressive, but quite sound in recognizing the need for their prime product/service and had done a lot more than most others to work toward solving the pipeline dilema along with tying up huge amounts of Nat.Gas reserves.

I still think it will pay off for them, although I agree with you that they way overplayed their hand with Davis in thinking his popularity would remain stable. Politics plays out just like the atmosphere... the winds rush from high pressure to low pressure cells.

Did you notice the press reports of Ken Lay being in league with Clinton, Clinton & Gore on "Global Warming," and Kyoto to drive up the demand for Nat. Gas even higher. You don't have to agree with these Demonicrat clowns to somewhat admire how well they manipulate the Media/Government complex. Calpine was trying to cash in on it too.

They sure are a bargain right now. Maybe you better git on board now while the gittin is REALLY good!(just kiddin)

16 posted on 01/19/2002 6:29:13 PM PST by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
I will wait and see who the next Kali Gov is before I would consider buying any Calpine stock!
17 posted on 01/20/2002 7:57:32 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TwoStep
I wish you were right but there are too many dumocRATs in Kalipornia and they will vote for Davis regardless.
18 posted on 01/20/2002 8:02:35 AM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: randita
--do you think people would actually invest in these bonds? To any significant degree, I mean?
19 posted on 01/20/2002 8:16:23 AM PST by zog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: zog
--do you think people would actually invest in these bonds? To any significant degree, I mean?

People will invest in anything if the interest rate is favorable and the payoff certain, which it will have to be or CA will not be able to get the money for the bonds in the first place.

But the more favorable the bonds are for investors, the less favorable they will be for the taxpayers or ratepayers of CA, who will be shouldering the cost of the bond interest for at least a decade to come.

20 posted on 01/20/2002 8:47:52 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson