Yes, exactly right.
What part of historical context can't you understand?
The combination of ignorance and arrogance can lead to silly posturing.
Just as today we live in a constitutional republic, but the congress makes laws that do not apply to themselves, and criminals like Clinton manipulate power to commit what would be for the rest of us crimes plain and simple.
You might ask, what part of the constitution do they believe does not apply to them? Nothing new here.
Is there a point you are trying to make? Why not be explicit about it?
I think the postee understood the point, even if you didn't, which is: murder was murder then, just as it is now. If he or you doesn't choose to agree that Constantine was guilty, is another matter. In historical terms, does the real definition of murder change or is it constant?