[RLK]

Your first two sentences are contradictory. Was it his way or violence,as you say, then he could not be violent.

------------------------

ammend the statement to say it was his superficially DECLARED way of non-violence. What he was proposing was what centential or Boolean logicians call alternation in a form so that the alternative became as validated as the superficially stated goal or method.

He also advocated a national minimum $6,400 income to be paid by the government through taxation of the wealthy. That's the equivant of about $35,000 today. He was a straight-out Marxist and revolutionary.

[breakem]

I stand by my statement of his accomplishments and what was needed in the country that practice inequality of service by governmental bodies.

Your attempt, regardless of the school of logic you espouse, to blame the violent reactions on the person holding up the mirror is ludicrous, but what can be done about you? Just as it is ludicrous to claim that black people entering a church invited others to bomb the church.