Jesse Jackson, Judge Mathis sued by Rev. Peterson & J-Watch

U.S. Newswire ^ | 01-16-02

[Mercuria]

Gonna see ya Monday? Huh? Huh? Huh?

**G**

[RonDog]

I will be there. ;)

[Jhoffa_]

JW, just WIN this one..

Okay?

[TheGrimReaper]

Bump for B.O.N.D.!!

[kattracks]

BTTT for Rev. Peterson!

[sneakypete]

Was this the son that is the congresscritter?

[timestax]

bump

[Mercuria]

No, sneaky, that's Jesse Jackson Jr.

It was Jonathan Jackson who was at the Toyota gathering.

[Brownie74]

Good luck to Peterson. Someone needs to take Jackson down.

[Brownie74]

Any lawsuit Larry Klayman files lacks credibility.

This is what bothers me. I don't think I would retain Klayman to fix a parking ticket for me.

[Twodees]

Miz Merc, I suspect that the "most severe critics of JW" will never support JW. They always list among their reasons the fact that no prosecutions have been brought as a result of JW suits. This ignores the obvious fact that JW is not a group of federal prosecutors.

It seems more likely to me that the more rabid of JW's critics simply fear that JW will reveal corruption of their own sainted republicans. They are pretty much absent from other threads about Rev. Peterson anyway, aren't they?

[Clara Lou]

It seems more likely to me that the more rabid of JW's critics simply fear that JW will reveal corruption of their own sainted republicans.
Ha ha ha--- not likely. Most critics of JW simply recognize Larry Klayman for what he is-- your basic ambulance-chaser. Name something this loser has accomplished that amounts to a hill of beans.

[Twodees]

His suits brought public attention to bear on many of the Clinton administration's crimes. With Clinton in firm control of the DoJ, there's little wonder that the suits didn't result in any prosecutions. However, with a republican majority in both houses of Congress, it's inexcusable that the IC's investigation was allowed to skirt the crimes and concentrate on minor scandals.

By your response, am I correct in assuming that you're a rabid critic of Klayman?

[Clara Lou]

I wouldn't say I'm a "rabid" critic. I appreciated Klayman when he was harrassing Clinton. It's his constant pointless lawsuits and money-grubbing since then. I just totally disrespect Larry. As far as I'm concerned, he reached his nadir when he tried to inject himself into court proceedings in Fla. during the election furor there. The judge in the proceedings told him he had no standing. That's Larry, alright.

[Twodees]

That's pretty much typical lawyer behavior on Klayman's part. Lawyers are often maddening people, but they can be useful, and are a necessary evil. Klayman did a lot to bring Clinton's crimes to the attention of people who may otherwise never have known about the full extent of his corruption.