I agree, which is why I focused on the relationships among Enron, the Indian officials, and the Clinton administration in this article. That's what got my attention. HRW's complaints have little to do with cozy relationships between Enron and the Clintonites; they're angry about how protesters were treated or some such. Not to sound flip, but that's not of interest to me here. The fact that the media is playing "shark" to Enron's "blood in the water" and trying to tie it all to Bush, ignoring previous Democrat relationships to Enron? THAT interests me.