Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RadioAstronomer
Narrow band? Hmmm.... Perhaps unfortunately for that approach, spread-spectrum may be a superior CW for many reasons, including efficient channel sharing and space-time signal demodulation i.e. turning multipath from a disadvantage into an advantage.
53 posted on 01/16/2002 5:23:41 PM PST by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: apochromat;RadioAstronomer
Doesn't spread spectrum consist of multiple narrow band carriers, though? (I don't know.) Presumably a spread spectrum transmission would still look different than white noise?
54 posted on 01/17/2002 1:04:46 AM PST by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: apochromat;jennyp
Narrow band? Hmmm.... Perhaps unfortunately for that approach, spread-spectrum may be a superior CW for many reasons, including efficient channel sharing and space-time signal demodulation i.e. turning multipath from a disadvantage into an advantage.

Indeed as we continue to cram more data into a frequency range, spread spectrum is the way to go. However, Radar and High-energy broadcasts are still required. Also if we spread out into the solar system, we will need hi power communications if were are to effectively communicate with many nodes. So a species may be noisy as radio develops, become quiet as the technology advances, and becomes noisy again as they expand into their solar system.

56 posted on 01/17/2002 3:10:30 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson