To: RadioAstronomer
Narrow band? Hmmm.... Perhaps unfortunately for that approach, spread-spectrum may be a superior CW for many reasons, including efficient channel sharing and space-time signal demodulation i.e. turning multipath from a disadvantage into an advantage.
To: apochromat;RadioAstronomer
Doesn't spread spectrum consist of multiple narrow band carriers, though? (I don't know.) Presumably a spread spectrum transmission would still look different than white noise?
54 posted on
01/17/2002 1:04:46 AM PST by
jennyp
To: apochromat;jennyp
Narrow band? Hmmm.... Perhaps unfortunately for that approach, spread-spectrum may be a superior CW for many reasons, including efficient channel sharing and space-time signal demodulation i.e. turning multipath from a disadvantage into an advantage.Indeed as we continue to cram more data into a frequency range, spread spectrum is the way to go. However, Radar and High-energy broadcasts are still required. Also if we spread out into the solar system, we will need hi power communications if were are to effectively communicate with many nodes. So a species may be noisy as radio develops, become quiet as the technology advances, and becomes noisy again as they expand into their solar system.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson