To: flamefront,truthandlife,Wallaby,kattracks,Uncle Bill,ratcat,golitely,ChaseR,Fred Mertz,rightwing2
Assuming that Iraq now has these stealth sensing radars and assuming that the US has a shortage of cruise missiles, should and will the GW administration delay in not toppling Saddam.
My opinion that the US should not delay because of the weapons of mass destruction which Iraq now possesses and is training AlQaeda how to use against the US. I am suspicious that some in the Bush administration are looking for excuses not to move agasint Iraq.
To: OKCSubmariner
And these Eastern European nations want to join NATO? Doesn't its security have more holes than Swiss cheese with France in it?
40 posted on
01/14/2002 3:05:53 PM PST by
gaspar
To: OKCSubmariner
I am suspicious that some in the Bush administration are looking for excuses ...As USMC Pvt. Gomer Pyle noted, "Well GOLLL-EEE. SURPRISE. SURPRISE. SURPRISE".
Big surprise indeed that OKC tars GW yet again on the flimsiest of media spinnery.
50 posted on
01/14/2002 5:57:57 PM PST by
dodger
To: OKCSubmariner
I am suspicious that some in the Bush administration are looking for excuses not to move agasint Iraq. There are significant risks involved, not to mention shoring up public support and all that goes with it. In short, invading Iraq could ignite a powder keg.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson